I wonder why Jews were never expelled from US. Maybe because they control the US since the beginning?
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
2
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
> describing democracy as the social propaganda of an ethnic oligarchy
Fundamentally that's not it. It's situational, and in a Democracy in an ethnic homogeneous country it wouldn't be that, so it's not fundamental to Democracy.
Democracy is rather the rule of the weak, the rule of weakness. It allows women to vote, who tend to vote left, for "soft" (good goy) policies and are heavily affected by propaganda and trivialities (sometimes they vote based on bad reasons). It allows the ignorant to vote with the same power as those who are knowledgeable. Aside from that it pursues a notion of equality, and along with it a notion to see humans "equal" to all others, or at least in voting power. That's why it is fundamental to them to see niggers as humans and as such as "equals."
In essence you can vote for 2 things: You pay less taxes and decrease parasitism, or you pay more taxes and increase parasitism. Every non-White has a tendency to favor parasitism. And White women are somewhere in the middle, so by default it's already a system shifted towards the left, and no politician that doesn't promise some degree of gibsmedats can win.
After a while politicians are all about outcompeting each other over who offers the most gibs.
So Democracy is fundamentally a system of systematic weakness, parasitism and effeminization. All it takes is for it to start rolling one time, and then it will never stop.
I don't think the influence of the most powerful people has ever been so weak within a multi-community voting system as to allow for real ideologically-fulfilled "democracy" to occur. I think it is like "communism" in that way.
"The tail wags the dog."
We can wax philosophical about how a democracy works in function but I think that is the trap that democracy propaganda offers for a system that uses voting chiefly as scoreboard for competition that is happening wildly outside of the system of the vote and the scope of the wants and desires of individual voters.
Fundamentally that's not it. It's situational, and in a Democracy in an ethnic homogeneous country it wouldn't be that, so it's not fundamental to Democracy.
Democracy is rather the rule of the weak, the rule of weakness. It allows women to vote, who tend to vote left, for "soft" (good goy) policies and are heavily affected by propaganda and trivialities (sometimes they vote based on bad reasons). It allows the ignorant to vote with the same power as those who are knowledgeable. Aside from that it pursues a notion of equality, and along with it a notion to see humans "equal" to all others, or at least in voting power. That's why it is fundamental to them to see niggers as humans and as such as "equals."
In essence you can vote for 2 things: You pay less taxes and decrease parasitism, or you pay more taxes and increase parasitism. Every non-White has a tendency to favor parasitism. And White women are somewhere in the middle, so by default it's already a system shifted towards the left, and no politician that doesn't promise some degree of gibsmedats can win.
After a while politicians are all about outcompeting each other over who offers the most gibs.
So Democracy is fundamentally a system of systematic weakness, parasitism and effeminization. All it takes is for it to start rolling one time, and then it will never stop.
"The tail wags the dog."
We can wax philosophical about how a democracy works in function but I think that is the trap that democracy propaganda offers for a system that uses voting chiefly as scoreboard for competition that is happening wildly outside of the system of the vote and the scope of the wants and desires of individual voters.