Yet another reason to hate (((them))). We're gonna need a bigger oven.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
22 comments:
12
1 year ago
12 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+12Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
This is why jews are so messed up, its a cycle of satanic ritual abuse.
The boys are sexually abused as infants in circumcision rites, the girls are raped, they are told that all other ethnic groups are subhuman and weren't created by their god (Saturn) and they are told that the entire world will kill them if they don't plot to kill them first. They treat them WORSE than their own children who they rape.
There is no such thing as a sane adult jew still in the faith or one that would subject their children to the same abuse they suffered. There is a reason Sodom was wiped off the face of the earth. Those kids had no chance to be sane just like modern day LBGT who is groomed the same way which is why you never hear about a correlation of abuse.
There is no such thing as a sane adult jew still in the faith or one that would subject their children to the same abuse they suffered. There is a reason Sodom was wiped off the face of the earth. Those kids had no chance to be sane just like modern day LBGT who is groomed the same way which is why you never hear about a correlation of abuse.
Should be sent to every loved one as well as their own websites in their own words with their own translation.
Direct link to video.
https://cdn.videy.co/0kdikwPF.mp4
Verse 11 that discusses what the Rabbi is talking about.
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/952876/jewish/Ishut-Chapter-Three.htm
Rev 3:9 pairs nicely with it as does a google about Herpes and Circumcision.
Direct link to video.
https://cdn.videy.co/0kdikwPF.mp4
Verse 11 that discusses what the Rabbi is talking about.
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/952876/jewish/Ishut-Chapter-Three.htm
Rev 3:9 pairs nicely with it as does a google about Herpes and Circumcision.
I've read this part of the Talmud. It's almost like a convoluted IQ test. The Jews probably use this part of the Talmud to make fun of Goys that don't understand it.
The context and the entire purpose of this part of the Talmud was saying that if a little girl (in this example a 3yo girl) was raped by a man that she didn't lose her value as a woman which was her virginity or purity. It's not saying you can rape 3yo girls. It's saying that a 3yo girl who is raped doesn't have to be considered as defiled such that she loses her value in a marriage to another man or to her family because she's no longer a virgin. Back in the days where a woman's virginity was seen as important, this passage in the Talmud would have been a good thing for girls not a bad thing because if she was tragically raped, she at least would be considered as a pure woman for marriage to a man and wouldn't have to be considered as "damaged goods" thus ruining her chances to be married to a good man because she was raped.
The context and the entire purpose of this part of the Talmud was saying that if a little girl (in this example a 3yo girl) was raped by a man that she didn't lose her value as a woman which was her virginity or purity. It's not saying you can rape 3yo girls. It's saying that a 3yo girl who is raped doesn't have to be considered as defiled such that she loses her value in a marriage to another man or to her family because she's no longer a virgin. Back in the days where a woman's virginity was seen as important, this passage in the Talmud would have been a good thing for girls not a bad thing because if she was tragically raped, she at least would be considered as a pure woman for marriage to a man and wouldn't have to be considered as "damaged goods" thus ruining her chances to be married to a good man because she was raped.
That's a fair criticism. "One only writes about it if it's a common enough occurence to write about." But that's not actually what the Talmud is saying though you can make that assertion. I don't defend them, I just don't like it when White people make a fool of themselves by not actually bothering to read or understand that which they are criticising.
You get upset when someone says something wrong about what was written in Mein Kampf or about Nazis because they don't understand or haven't taken the time to learn the truth? One doesn't need to lie or misrepresent something to point out the problem with Jews.
You get upset when someone says something wrong about what was written in Mein Kampf or about Nazis because they don't understand or haven't taken the time to learn the truth? One doesn't need to lie or misrepresent something to point out the problem with Jews.
>One only writes about it if it's a common enough occurence to write about." But that's not actually what the Talmud is saying though you can make that assertion.
Yeah, I'm going to make that assertion.. So why does the Talmud mention it? And why is this kike so interested in the subject matter? Is there any comparison we can draw upon from other cultures?
Yeah, I'm going to make that assertion.. So why does the Talmud mention it? And why is this kike so interested in the subject matter? Is there any comparison we can draw upon from other cultures?
Sure, in the Bible it talks about how men should be forced to marry a woman if he rapes her. Does that mean Christians always rape women?
From a logical perspective that doesn't even make sense though.
"If you break it, you buy it. So everything you've ever bought meant you first broke it."
If someone was dumb enough to think that, that's damning. And imagine enough people being so dumb that you had to spend more than twenty seconds explaining this. much more right a passage about it in a book.
And why the weird shit about the blood? Does that matter for a woman's dignity or value being lost? He goes on and on about it.
"If you break it, you buy it. So everything you've ever bought meant you first broke it."
If someone was dumb enough to think that, that's damning. And imagine enough people being so dumb that you had to spend more than twenty seconds explaining this. much more right a passage about it in a book.
And why the weird shit about the blood? Does that matter for a woman's dignity or value being lost? He goes on and on about it.
The problem is that discussing the rape of 0-3 year old babies is utterly insane. This is African nigger level of "rape babies to cure AIDS" level of low IQ and depravity. Apparently for jews it's an all-time hot topic.
Why not talk about how a bridge remains untainted when a man humps it less than 72 times? Or how defecating into a toilet is different from intercourse, and then elaborating on the reasoning for 2000+ years?
This is "floor is made of floor" levels of "intellectual discourse."
And btw, the takeaway is that it's fine or "not that bad" to rape 0-3 old babies. I mean what the fuck? It deserves the hanging from the highest of ropes.
Why not talk about how a bridge remains untainted when a man humps it less than 72 times? Or how defecating into a toilet is different from intercourse, and then elaborating on the reasoning for 2000+ years?
This is "floor is made of floor" levels of "intellectual discourse."
And btw, the takeaway is that it's fine or "not that bad" to rape 0-3 old babies. I mean what the fuck? It deserves the hanging from the highest of ropes.
Disgusting that someone actually came to defend this part of the Talmud. Your logic falls short when the child turns 3 years old. And the rabbi says "you can have sex with an infant under 3", and even says "god forbid you have sex with one older than 3", clearly stating that it is okay and within their morals to rape babies.
Im blocking you.
Im blocking you.
Toast message