New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
12
posted 1 year ago by Conspirologist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror )
You must log in or sign up to comment
11 comments:
12
PermaBand on scored.co
1 year ago 12 points (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror )
>Media companies make increasingly shitty slop no one will pay for, so ISPs should get rid of their paying customers too because it's only fair

Lol. Kikes seething always makes me laugh.
derpfroot on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
>ISP Grande loses appeal as 5th Circuit sides with Universal, Warner, and Sony.

"jew court sides with jew companies."

 I'm shocked, I tell ya!
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
They sure aren't making money by using their IPs, lawsuits are the only way to profit.
HEXEN on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
So if I do donuts through mcdonalds wifi, will mcdonalds internet be cut off? 🤔
Conspirologist on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 2 children
No. It's public Wi-Fi.
HEXEN on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
If I replace all their LCD menus with happy merchant, will they lose customers? 🤔
Conspirologist on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
No. Their customers IQ is the lowest possible.
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
By this logic, I can start a home business and offer free wifi on paper. Then blame all the "crimes" on my customers.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
>"The evidence at trial demonstrated that Grande had a simple measure available to it to prevent further damages to copyrighted works (i.e., terminating repeat infringing subscribers), but that Grande never took it," the 5th Circuit ruling said.

Much like how you can prevent speeding by seizing a person's car.

Why are the courts still acting like piracy is even a crime? It's been clearly, and repeatedly, shown to correlate with higher sales. I'd be surprised if piracy, on the whole, hasn't been declining due to all the terrible crap that's been put out over the last decade.

But no, they're going to block this ISP from serving customers due to something they have no control over. Do ISPs not have Section 230 protections? Or just the jewed ones?
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Section 230 should cover all service providers, including ISPs, cloud services and forums hosting user provided content. Most other developed countries never needed such regulations as hard evidence is required to convict someone for internet related "crimes", hence it could never be proven that a service provider is in any way responsible.

(((They))) did some changes to section 230 recently tho, perhaps it only protects some chosen providers now, I can't remember, but do notice how many smaller services has become a lot more careful recently.
1Corporal on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
wheres by bottle of rum
Toast message