New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
posted 1 year ago by Storkday88 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror )
You must log in or sign up to comment
11 comments:
12
devotech2 on scored.co
1 year ago 12 points (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror )
Yall are real comfortable with throwing around the j word for people with literally no fucking proof whatsoever of jewishness. Even Hitler gets thrust into this "debate" from time to time with the same shoestring bullshit unprovable theories about alleged kikery.

From the horse's mouth (the people who have actually done the dna testing on his and his sons remains): "there are traits compatible with jewish heritage"

This string of words means literally nothing. It could mean anything whatever, if you consider that the entire jewish race is a mongrel one. It would be more damning if it said "traits compatible with Mongolian heritage" or something. But "compatible with jewish heritage" is a nothingburger sentence. There *is no* jewish race. He could have Slavic, arabic, whatever blood mixed in and it would easily give a false positive for jewish blood because jews share those traits.

Even his native Italian blood could throw in a red herring for Sephardic dna traits because Sephardic jews are mostly mediterannean. Dna testing is far from exact because it measures genetic affinities for a specific population. I myself did a dna test (I know, I know, it was before I was redpilled on where that information actually goes), and it said I was 50 percent anglo saxon english and polish, but that my brother was 50 percent northern german. These populations share genetic affinities for each other. Hence the fuckery. In reality, for both of us, its all of the above. The same thing happens with jews, by an absolute magnitude more because of how mixed they actually are. The most nordic, a10, hyperborean looking man on the face of the planet could get a positive for "ashkenazi jewish" due to the fact that ashkenazi jews share generic affinity with nords because of how mongrelized they are.

Plus, considering how high profile the man was, did you not consider that perhaps the Spanish authorities would have done some kind of testing on limpieza de sangre for Columbus? The testing wouldn't have been as tight as a modern genetic studies, to be sure, but the Spaniards were pretty damned good at finding conversos.
BeefyBelisarius on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
What kind of weird name is Amler and why does she only write books glorifying jews?

https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/1308032.Jane_Frances_Amler
GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 2 children
Oh please, i don't care what the kikes say (just a decade ago they were condemning him as a RASIS)

he achieved greatness and his discovery allowed us to utilize the resources and spices from the americas into Europe

imagine what the world would be like with no paprika, no potatoes and no cacao, tomatoes, and vanilla (also tobacco)

America was the golden land of riches, unexploited by the nigger-tier natives and With the White man's magic, cultivated into a grand industry which all people enjoy to this day.

polskagurom on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
no paprika, no tomatoes??????

weird because It was a shithole, spanish came, not a shithole, spanish left, became shithole again
GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
but the produce of said shithole were divine, avocados too all came from mexico

and did the spanish actually leave? i thought they merely mongrelized themselves to oblivion and simply became nigger tier
devotech2 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
The Spanish did leave, not the people but the empire was kicked out (by other Spaniards, not mutts, and even one Irishman in Chile, mind you) and the stream of colonists ended afterwards.

The people that stayed behind did not necessarily completely mongrelize themselves (there are plenty of whites in South and Central America) but they were always a minority compared to mestizos. And mestizos were the middle rung of the caste system, castizos were second place, full natives were 4th, and niggers were naturally last place.

The USA has selection bias for Latinos because they're all dirt poor sudra-tier beaners from Mexico (Mexico is actually close to 50% white spaniard, but those people do not move to other countries much now do they?) Or they're Indians from Guatemala or Honduras where even mestizos are a minority compared to natives.

Places like Chile, Argentina, Southern Brazil, and Uruguay remain solidly majority white (moreso than America, sadly) and those people pretty much never go anywhere. America gets the worst of the worst by default. In spain most of the Latinos that immigrate are white exchange students from middle class families in Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, Paraguay, etc. So the selection bias in Iberia proper is actually in reverse. Everyone here still hates Latinos though because of how they speak Spanish

Storkday88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Columbus was proto globohomo, with a typical genocidal jew mentality. I know he was a jew because he acted like one.

(((Imperialism))) isn't based.
Feelsgood2020 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Let the Italians have him.
PopularCancer on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Imagine trusting a book written by someone with the surname Amler
GenghisCohen on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Puerto ricans are the rape children of Jews and indigenous Americans. That's why they're so ugly.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Maybe he was one of the few decent ones considering (((they))) hate him so much.
Toast message