You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
Gottmituns_ on scored.co
1 year ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
This is the first of these I've listened to. I appreciate some of your insights, and I'm glad we have people on our side being vocal. That being said, I urge you to be more accurate and to read more history. It's fine to simplify, but doing so accurately requires a broad understanding such that you can be certain you are only including what is critical. For example, you skipped over the renaissance, which I would argue fits much better into your argument than William of Ockham, and if you bring up Ockham, why not discuss his idea of voluntarism? That in my mind is a much more significant split from the scholastic tradition than his nominalism (conceptualism is a more accurate term imo), which one could argue is just a radical continuation of Aristotelianism.
Secondly, it seems like you assume a level of continuity within Roman Catholicism that I simply do not see. I can probably guess what you think of the Pope and of modern Roman doctrine, and that makes me wonder how your relation to the church is any different than was the case with the early protestants, specifically the Lutherans. Anyways, God bless, hope you both continue to make episodes and that you don't perceive this as unnecessarily critical.
As response to the first part, thanks for your criticism. l will take it to heart. I will also say that you seem to have passionate thoughts about this so I would encourage you to consider doing podcasting too. It only take a computer, microphone and basic recording software. And Podbean only costs $15 a month to distribute your podcast everywhere. We need more voices!
As for the second part, I am not sure what you mean. I assent to the Catholic Faith in its entirety from the beginning. I go by the St Vincent of Lerins rule: I believe in all things that all Catholics believed in all times. I interpret everything with a hermeneutic of traditional continuity.
Secondly, it seems like you assume a level of continuity within Roman Catholicism that I simply do not see. I can probably guess what you think of the Pope and of modern Roman doctrine, and that makes me wonder how your relation to the church is any different than was the case with the early protestants, specifically the Lutherans. Anyways, God bless, hope you both continue to make episodes and that you don't perceive this as unnecessarily critical.
As response to the first part, thanks for your criticism. l will take it to heart. I will also say that you seem to have passionate thoughts about this so I would encourage you to consider doing podcasting too. It only take a computer, microphone and basic recording software. And Podbean only costs $15 a month to distribute your podcast everywhere. We need more voices!
As for the second part, I am not sure what you mean. I assent to the Catholic Faith in its entirety from the beginning. I go by the St Vincent of Lerins rule: I believe in all things that all Catholics believed in all times. I interpret everything with a hermeneutic of traditional continuity.