You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
2
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)
They may have crashed the planes, but the plane crashes wasn't the cause of the towers collapsing perfectly into their own foundation. WTC1,2 and 7 were all rigged with something that cuts through the beams, causing a collapse that would be tricky to achieve even for the best demolition experts.
Something that triggers by fire, which the planes provided just enough of. WTC7 was purposefully set on fire, most likely set to be hit by plane 93 which never made it due to "antisemitic" passengers messing with (((their))) plan.
Had it been a 100% Muslim attack, with only the plane crashes without jewish interference the damage would be no more than that of a regular office fire. They would have to repair a few floors, replace many windows and so on but all towers would still stand. Just like Greenfell, and all other towers that has been exposed to massive fires without collapsing perfectly over their own foundation.
Heck not even Chynese wind turbines collapse when the generator oil catch fire and the whole top is burning. And that's inferior bugman steel.
Something that triggers by fire, which the planes provided just enough of. WTC7 was purposefully set on fire, most likely set to be hit by plane 93 which never made it due to "antisemitic" passengers messing with (((their))) plan.
Had it been a 100% Muslim attack, with only the plane crashes without jewish interference the damage would be no more than that of a regular office fire. They would have to repair a few floors, replace many windows and so on but all towers would still stand. Just like Greenfell, and all other towers that has been exposed to massive fires without collapsing perfectly over their own foundation.
Heck not even Chynese wind turbines collapse when the generator oil catch fire and the whole top is burning. And that's inferior bugman steel.