Consume Product - Arete Network

International Law is a lot gayer and jewier than I thought

posted 1 year ago by BraveOsttruppen on scored.co (+0 / -0 / )

Permalink

I just watched this video in YT recommended --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNjgltkqTzc&ab_channel=EmperorTigerstar

The tldw of the video is that there was some feudal state part of the UK that technically existed until 2008. It came to an end when two (((billionaires))) show up and started buying up property on the island. Then they started demanding (((democracy))) and (((lobbying))) for lower taxes and reduced power of Seigneur (the owner of the fief). When (((they))) didn't get what they wanted they started closing down businesses and destroying the economy of the island in retaliation.

Some guy claim to be the heir to the title watched the video and made a comment. Someone replied to him asking him why they don't raise a militia and kick the (((billionaires))) off the island and seize the property back for the people. He responded by saying that would be a violation of (((international law))). (((international law))) states that a state can't seize property from an individual using military force without some kind of justification.

So there it is. This island got kiked and couldn't retaliate because (((international law))) wouldn't allow them to use force. They would have to use legal maneuvers or buy up all the property back (aka compete with money). The entire system is designed to remove your power, and exploit the power that the (((elites))) have over you. With jews, you always lose.

Brannvesen on scored.co

1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

Eminent domain is also an option, they can't complain if they get compensated. Just make sure to make the offer less than market value. Now if this happens in a situation were the government tries to screw the little guy, the little guy can stay in his house and defend it for a long time until the offer goes up. And in such story the little guy is often seen as the good guy.

A billionaire simply won't live like that, and hence can't do much if the government buy up the land at fractions of the market value. The (((billionaire))) can move squatters there perhaps, but those can be evicted with relative ease and in the end it's gonna be the (((billionaire))) looking bad, not the government.

Permalink Reply

Captain_Raamsley on scored.co

1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child

Eminent domain is not a willing transaction. No matter how much you get paid, under common law it is still theft and you can retaliate.

1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )

But will the (((billionaires))) have the resources to do that? If you're the little guy just protecting your own home it's a different story, you risk losing everything you own and have nothing to lose by fighting back. For the (((billionaires))) it's just a few shekels loss, a tax write off. (((They))) usually back down temporary when facing too much resistance.