New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
112
Fighting for Justice (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by diogenesOTarch on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +112Score on mirror )
26 comments
Permalink
Mirrored from scored.co
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
3
AgnosticTemplar on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 3 children
This works both ways, though. If one of us were ever accosted by a random nigger, if the prosecutor could use the character of the victim in court 'most normal people' would say *vile racists* like us deserved to be beaten by niggers, even unprovoked.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
2
RoulerBleu on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
The difference is the court will not withold the information if it helps a black murderer walk free to share it.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
AgnosticTemplar on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
True.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
HegelianDichotomy on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
The facts of the matter should only be pertinent to the matter. It makes sense to limit the scope of the trial in this way. The same judge ruled Kyle's previous comments while watching a dollar general getting looted by niggers inadmissible for the same reason, but that didn't stop the prosecution from trying to bring it up. That resulted in him excusing the jury, but we probably remember that.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
The difference is that we dont go around beating and attacking nogs, whereas this jew already committed multiple counts of a heinous crime.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Toast message