You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
2
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)2 children
>And if I recall the “trans” Roman emperor
Are you thinking of Nero, who wasnt a tranny himself, but certainly experimented by trying to create trannies? He is thought by many scholars to have been the Antichrist St John was speaking of.
Nero didnt cross-dress himself, so maybe it was a different fag. Some of the earlier roman emperors were massive degenerates, which is probably why they initially hated Christianity.
Trannyism in its modern form is a relatively new abomination, while crossdressing effeminates existed in enough numbers for the Bible to have a passage formally condemning the practice as an abomination, I dont think anyone but the demon addled lunatics actually believed they could change sex. Claiming that trannyism was ever accepted in society is utterly delusional, it only ever cropped up (alongside faggotry) in times of complete societal decline, and of course in degenerate Gnostic sects like the Cathars and of course the Synagogue of Satan. Its so utterly opposed to nature that even the most savage of negro pagans find it repulsive. Such degeneracy was rare and hated among the Greeks and Romans, despite what modern fags claim, the only way to get away with it would be to be excessively wealthy and powerful, which is why some of the emperors were massive degenerates.
Are you thinking of Nero, who wasnt a tranny himself, but certainly experimented by trying to create trannies? He is thought by many scholars to have been the Antichrist St John was speaking of.