Foundational Lies
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
* Hollywood is government propaganda. Not parts of it. Not some of them. Not sometimes. Literally all of Hollywood and everyone working there is a knowingly or unknowingly participating in a government-run operation to control narratives.
* The most famous actors are the most willing to play ball.
* The ones who mysteriously vanish after a short successful career are the ones who refused to participate.
* The ones who mysteriously died were the ones who were threatening to blow some whistles.
* We're not destroying the environment. The purpose of the "climate change" narrative is so that Walmart et.al can make more money selling you cloth bags and you don't notice you're getting fleeced because you feel good about not polluting.
* Electric vehicles and organic/vegan/non-GMO *anything*: Same shit
* 9/11 did happen mostly as advertised, but it was a joint op between US and Israel. Who else but your greatest ally will help you stage a false flag on your own soil?
* The whole pandemic was just an elaborate wealth transfer. That's not even a conspiracy, it just happened.
* Epstein was pimping out minors to powerful men simply to incriminate and then blackmail them. Nothing came of the pedophile island because almost everyone was involved. Literally nothing changed after he didn't kill himself.
* Aliens might be real but UFOs are fake and gay and it's just a ready-to-go psyop they can grab off the shelf to distract you for a few news cycles when necessary.
* Earth is not flat, fight me
* US astronauts DID NOT land on the moon in 1969 then 50 years later we have about a 50% success rate sending unmanned rovers to Mars. I'm sorry but gtfo. I'm sure NASA gave it their best shot but then had to fake it when they realized how much they severely overestimated their capabilities.
* I don't believe the "nukes are fake" theory but am definitely intrigued by all the petulant soyfaggotry that comes up every time it's discussed.
* I believe the "lizard people" not in the literal sense, but the people at the very top live such different lives than the rest of us, they might as well be an entirely different species.
* Probably a few others idk, i should be working
As someone with some insider knowledge due to relatives who have worked for NASA, I can safely tell you that you are wrong, the truth is a lot more retarded. We *did* land on the moon, because it was a joint effort between the most brilliant Nazi rocket scientists and an america that was still white and meritocratic. What happened is that we didnt so much lose the technology, rather (((DEI))) initiatives began in NASA a lot earlier than the rest of society, and it was also a net money drain that wasnt exactly producing much the government could use. The amount of money required for even the most rudimentary space exploration is ridiculous, and the only reason the US had to land on the moon was one-upping the USSR. When the USSR fell, there was no real reason to keep on burning money when there wasnt another space capable super-power to threaten us. So NASA basically ran out of actually competent people and slowly became an adult daycare for diversity hires, more concerned with removing the word "man" from all their slogans rather than actually doing innovation. If jew nepotism under the DEI banner continues to infest the rest of society, we will see similar technological stagnation and regression, and people in 40 years will be asking if Personal Computers were ever real because no one will be able to build one.
>the only reason the US had to land on the moon was one-upping the USSR. When the USSR fell, there was no real reason to keep on burning money
They successfully one-upped the USSR, then kept burning money. The USSR dissolved, and they kept burning money. To this day, NASA is still operating and burning money, so that explanation doesn't add up. What *does* add up is that they faked it in '69 and have been slowly trying to catch up IRL since then (with very poor results I might add).
Further, the entire concept of "no reason to keep going to the moon" is preposterous. What does that even mean? You, reading this right now, can you honestly tell me that if you were the director of NASA in 1972, with the technology to put men on the moon, that you couldn't figure out a single fucking reason to continue developing the technology? Be honest with yourself.
I've also heard that "the public lost interest" which is equally preposterous. Space travel is a mainstay of science fiction. Little boys dreaming of traveling the stars has been a cliche for generations. You're telling me if you had an astronaut livestreaming a walk on the moon, people would just roll their eyes and switch to their favorite twitch streamer sitting on their ass playing Hearthstone? "Lost interest" my ass, I feel like that's blatant gaslighting.
Tell me, what's the point of companies like Space X and Blue Origin? If attempting to make space flights commercially viable and profitable is a reasonably pursuable idea in 2024, wouldn't the same have been true **50 years ago** back when NASA supposedly had that shit down to a science?
In 2023, several dozens of millionaires lined up to pay $100,000+ to hop into a tiny makeshift janky submarine to go see the bottom of the ocean, 5 at a time. And that makes total sense to you. But take those same wealthy folks and offer them a flight into space and you want me to believe they'd be like
> Oi naah mate! I’m good, innit? Rather save me dosh for a proper knees-up bruv
Bottom line is you're asking me to believe that the USA would have had a 50 year head start on commercializing space flight but said "nah fuck it let's save a little money instead" while not actually saving much money this whole time.
In closing, I'll quote some numbers from google's top results (which is absolutely censored and highly curated to all shit I'll admit, but is still useful to prove when "mainstream" claims contradict themselves):
* "The Apollo 17 mission, which took place in December 1972, had an estimated cost of around $450 million at the time. Adjusted for inflation, that would be roughly equivalent to about $2.5 billion today."
* "NASA's budget for financial year (FY) 2020 is $22.6 billion".
* 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
>people in 40 years will be asking if Personal Computers were ever real because no one will be able to build one
A better analogy would be that people in 80 years will be asking if the holocaust actually happened because upon further inspection some of the evidence makes no fucking sense and boy oh boy wouldn't you know it...👀👀👀
Please stop falling for this retarded kike conspiracy theory put out as a way to discredit those who name the Jew. The reason sending men to the moon is so difficult nowadays is 1) deliberate sabotage by the kikes and their master Lucifer who don't want any potential slaves escaping this prison planet and 2) because NASA is staffed by niggers, faggots, women, and kikes now as opposed to the highly intelligent White men of yore.