Russia to ban childfree propaganda
(www.france24.com)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
Religious pontificating aside, the law of Creation says "the ultimate moral good is more, healthier children for you, your family, and your whole bloodline."
Morality appeared in social animals in order to maximize intergenerational tribal fertility, and the resulting morals are slightly different for each species. The gods invented by men will see their religions expand or collapse according to how well they conform to evolutionary morality. (That's what's actually causing the collapse of Christian faith: it offers no advantage over the mainstream when seeking a chaste and fertile wife. Which is also why Mormons are doing so well, because they do.)
When a religion gets things spot on, it's discovering God's laws, not decreeing them. There's no penalty for useless-but-harmless laws, like saying "women need to be segregated during shark week", or "don't eat beef with milk". But such things are the will of men, not God.
Porn, faggotry, feminism, premarital sex, individualism, these are all sinful because they have a negative effect on birth rates, which means they oppose the immutable laws of the True Creator God, who has made his laws the foundation of continued existence.
He's not a moral scold or a ghostwriter for books penned by man, He's the original author of physics.
His Divine Punishment is extinction.
If you're arguing with a liberal, evolutionary morality is a far more effective argument than "someone claiming to be God said so, so I agree and so should you."
I mean, who the fuck is going to argue that non-existence is more moral than existence? Why would they still be alive if they thought so? Why would they be sad at a death, or happy at a birth? But religious arguments can be dismissed out of hand.