New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
40
posted 1 year ago by Conspirologist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +40Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
KingSweyn on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Great intent, wrong execution.

You want your society to have more babies? Which one of these do you think is most effective?

Suppressing anti-baby messaging
Promoting pro-baby messaging
Reducing the challenge$ of parenting
Rewarding the parents for the birth of their child

First off, pro-baby efforts are always more effective than anti-anti-baby efforts. The answer is #2, but it's not just commercials and billboards. It's a whole cultural campaign to insist that parents are superior citizens and that childless people rarely deserve respect. To convince sheep that having a college degree and career is trash compared to being a good parent.

Understand: if Taylor Swift had a baby today, tens of thousands of her fans would be mothers within the next year. Celebrity status is the most important pro-baby message, because celebrity is *peak social status*. We have to control who becomes celebrity, as the jews do.

If you want to go hardcore, women over 25 without children should not allowed on TV, even fictional characters, even celebrities. They are not permitted in ANY culturally elevated position, teaching, show host, anything. Come back when you're a mom, and we'll celebrate the fuck out of it, and run a quick news blast every time a celebrity gives birth.

Men will follow the women. We're not the driving force of cultural reproduction. Women seeking respect from their culture are.
Toast message