New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
131
posted 1 year ago by RJ567 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +131Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
19
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 19 points (+0 / -0 / +19Score on mirror ) 2 children
In a lot of ways, National Socialism was a bit of a compromise in government.

The late 19th/early 20th century was a nightmare for the working class. It was genuine hell on earth how they were treated. In America, you were lucky if you even got paid in *actual money* instead of company scrip you could only spend at the company store, and you had to pay your rent in scrip which meant if you lost your job, you were immediately made homeless and had no savings.

It's no wonder Marxism became so popular. The blind excesses of the worthless bourgeoise whose insulated, privileged dynastic lifestyles made them utterly clueless as to what was happening to the vastly larger workers who actually kept everything running... *surprise!* they all show up in a huge army to cut your fucking heads off and take your shit! Who knew that starving 80% of the country and pretending it wasn't happening might backfire!

Communism was rocketing to popularity around the world, even in the United States, which is how we ended up with the New Deal and all these faggoty laws protecting labor unions. If the US didn't manage to pull its economy out of the dumpster as quickly as it did, it'd probably have become a communist nation 100 years ago.

Hitler correctly identified many of the problems with capitalism, with communism, with organized labor, with globalism, with anarchy and libertarianism. The whole gist of NatSoc was essentially to try to corral people's morality in a productive manner.

America is an immoral country and has been for generations. The entire reason American conservatism failed is because conservatives listened to faggots like Reagan who *really* popularized the worship of money as religion. This is how the right lost every single fucking cultural and political lever they had a grip on, because all that mattered was their fucking money. Why be a teacher when you get more fucking money as an entrepreneur? Why be a public servant when you've been taught to believe that taxes are a crime, therefore salaries paid of taxes are a crime, therefore you're a scumbag if you take a salary paid for by taxes?

None of this shit paid off except on individual levels, and yet, all American conservatives hoped to do, their entire grand vision for the future, was genuinely to be buried with all their shit like some kind of Pharaoh. They know that hoarding money for themselves has no positive outcome on the future, it was just about fulfilling their own needs and fucking everyone else over, and when they die they try to take it all with them.

The left was infinitely smarter. They even wrote this shit down in books but conservatives were too addicted to money to think to care. Alinsky et. al. outright said 'who cares if you aren't paid more, it's the ideological victory that matters, you should see yourself as a soldier in a fight for the future' so they became teachers. What did the right do? "lmao those liberal teachers, look at how POOR they are, look at how RICH I am, I'm totally winning!' And then what happened? Their children came home as actual dick-loving faggots and Marxist footsoldiers who reported their own parents to the FBI after J6.

It still hasn't stopped to this day. Boats are really expensive to own. There's these gay-ass Trump 'boat parades' where all the rich Boomer faggots get in their faggotmobiles and fag around in the faggy harbor with their faggy flags. It's literally just a parade of assholes showing off how rich they are. They aren't making a difference... in fact, it's people who can't afford boats who hate them even more for it. You might as well have "Trump supporter money-burning event" and you literally just show up and throw wads of cash into a bonfire. It's the same thing.

Conservatives won in the sense that they successfully replaced the nation with that of an economic zone. It's not a 'Christian' nation, it's not a 'White/European' nation. It's a *capitalist* nation. And even the left knows that, and it's that resentment that drives youth communist movements. Because they see their Boomer parents taking out reverse mortgages so they can vacation in Europe twice a year... except you need a house to have a reverse mortgage, and the kids won't ever be allowed to own a house, so they'll never get to retire. It's the moneyed bourgeoise just rubbing their privilege and dynastic wealth in the faces of the poor and are completely checked out, once again.

And once again, the starving masses are ready to chop the heads off of the elites to take their shit.

What happens if you are shit to the working caste? They overthrow and murder you, but because the working caste are typically pretty fucking stupid, they're going to mismanage and utterly fuck up everything.

What happens if you are shit to the owners of private property? They leave, they take their expertise with them, you're left with a nation of freeloaders who can't innovate and just await their next handout.

What happens if you leave people to their own moral devices? They become degenerate, prioritizing seeking pleasure through pointless dopamine hits via drugs, media, sex, etc. You need to steer them in a direction to seek positivity by affecting positive changes around them.

NatSoc was authoritarian, but humans have always proven they need authority to function. jews are bad, yes, but inside the heart of every man is a tiny piece of jew that will steal, lie, and fuck anyone ever if given the chance. This piece of jew is larger in some than others.

Communism is saying 'people need places to live, so you aren't allowed to own a place to live. You'll live where we say and we can move you at will if we need you to work in some uranium mine in Kazakhstan.'

Capitalism is saying 'people need places to live, so not only can you own as much as you want, but you can actually have a deathless corporation own it all, so gradually over hundreds of years, your immortal legal entity can consume the entire country with an army not of soldiers, but of lawyers.'

NatSoc would be saying 'people need places to live, so you can have a home that is yours and yours alone. People can reward themselves for working hard and have a second home as a mom-and-pop landlord, because renting does have its place, or for a vacation cottage. But you have no need and have no right to own vast quantities of homes and land to hoard for your personal gain, when doing so is putting your fellow citizens at risk, so we're going to forbid that degree of ownership, and we don't care if you don't think it's fair.'

But you wouldn't need to do that, if you can teach that little piece of jew in the heart of Man to wholeheartedly believe, himself, that hoarding properties as a massive landlord is a shitty thing to do, and they wouldn't really go to those lengths of their own accord in the first place.
Enygger_Tzu on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
A +1 from me on all of it.
KingSweyn on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Fire-tier effortpoast, fren.
Toast message