The Old South was the last embodiment of the ancient English society
(media.scored.co)
And of whites being too lazy to do their own damned work.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
23 comments:
You get one of 2 choices.
95% self employment, strong, self-reliant agricultural society. Enslaved class of outlanders.
15% self employment, no self reliance. Everybody works for an increasingly anti-human and centralized monopolistic agglomeration. 95% of society is enslaved in a debt scheme that feeds off an hourly wage - credit ratio system.
95% self employment, strong, self-reliant agricultural society. Enslaved class of outlanders.
15% self employment, no self reliance. Everybody works for an increasingly anti-human and centralized monopolistic agglomeration. 95% of society is enslaved in a debt scheme that feeds off an hourly wage - credit ratio system.
As awesome as th' confederacy was, it is hard to ignore th' fact that they are one of th' reasons why we now have large hoards of mutant half spawns in Wiemarica now.
Edit: downvoting without responding, total plebbit behavior.
Edit: downvoting without responding, total plebbit behavior.
I agree, but take away that norman bullshit on the left please. We're the descendants of the saxons, not the kikeish normans, who are the root from which every single problem plaguing the anglosphere has budded from. Yes, even preceding actual jews, who only existed in England because William the bastard brought them there.
Let's face it: Even if all kikes, niggers, and other non Europeans were to disappear forever in a puff of smoke on th' 'morrow, us Europeans would probably just start fighting and dividing amongst ourselves again.
The normans were pretty fucking special among Europeans if you do some digging on why they were actually so bad.
They mimicked jews almost to a T
They mimicked jews almost to a T
Exhibit A: William the conqueror introduced jews to England almost immediately after taking power, not by mistake but purposefully, knowing that they were yids. This alone should be reason enough to hate the normans
Exhibit B: the normans formed an aristocracy that was incredibly pompous and elitist towards the anglo saxon people. Completely alienating themselves purposefully by speaking an entirely different language (french) that the people could not understand, not teaching them French at all, and sometimes even living in Normandy instead of England.
Exhibit C: the normans forced the English catholic church into much more direct control by the papacy, which was wildly unpopular (eventually this would be the impetus for the people converting to anglicanism), and changed mass from English language mass to Latin mass, which the anglo saxon populace did not understand and did not have the means to learn.
Exhibit D: the normans used genocide to great effect during the harrowing of the North where they burned down farmland, raped and pillaged civilians, and slaughtered every farm animal they could find to reduce the northern english population to virtually nothing just to stamp out a tiny group of rebels that posed no threat. This was very brutal even by medieval standards and mimics the holodomor.
Exhibit E: the normans introduced feudalism to England to enslave the anglo saxon population and keep the norman elite fat, wealthy, and happy. Feudalism would have under normal circumstances been an advancement, but the system introduced by the normans was intentional slavery of the anglo saxons, and English peasants had it quite a bit worse than peasants on the continent because their lords just hated them.
Exhibit F: the normans would be the direct cause of the now hundreds of years old conflict between England and Ireland by invading Ireland for virtually no reason whatsoever, the only reason the normans even gave was a supposed papal bull. This would also be the case for Scotland as well, but the acts of union backtracked this to some degree.
Exhibit G: outlawing the property rights of the anglo saxons. This ties into the feudalism point. The anglo saxons had a strong belief in land ownership and the normans snatched it away from them and divided it among their own elite.
Exhibit H (this list is getting exhaustive): the norman forest laws. The anglo saxon populace was not allowed to cut down trees, own a bow, or hunt animals for food. The punishment for this would be to have the index and middle fingers cut off of the hand. If this isn't proof that they had an unnecessary hatred of the English, I don't know what is. This also ties heavily into the point about English peasants being significantly more fucked over than, say, a French or a German peasant.
Exhibit I: the normans dragged the English along into their stupid, still ongoing territorial disputes in France and would sacrifice, in due time, *millions* of people for territory that they would never even end up gaining in France, and later on, colonial possessions that they never even got control over either. The English conflict with France is actually fucking retarded and the normans were the cause of it. They had a hatred of France because of their ancestors war with the country and wanted to get back at them, and sacrificed the anglo saxons for a cause that never came to fruition at all. It was like the battle of isonzo, but on crack and over the span of nearly a millennium.
Exhibit J: this isn't really a crime against the English, because it never killed anyone or contributed to their slavery, but it annoys me anyways, and it is kind of fucked because it destroyed a culture. The normans filibustered England's dealings with scandinavian states and the scandinavian influence in England in favor of stupid wars with France mentioned prior. The anglo saxon English had a semi-scandinavian culture from dealings with the Norse for close to the entire existence of England. The mercy of alfred the great towards the Danes after the defeat of the latter led to a thriving blend of the 2 cultures (actual, white, multiculturalism) and the hybrid society was an incredibly efficient and vibrant one in just about every way, one of the most in all of Europe. The Normans kind of, you know, fucking destroyed all of it
Another point that doesn't tie into their crimes, but really more addressing your point about them being great conquerors, is that they really weren't. They just took advantage of rare circumstances for a war they otherwise would have lost, badly. The normans invaded from the deep south right after Harold Godwinson emerged victorious from a long war with the vikings in the far flunged northern corner of England. Godwinsons exhausted army covered the distance in a surprisingly short amount of time and came to the battlefield starving, war torn, and exhausted. Despite this, the normans were still losing for most of the battle of hastings, and only won because they took advantage of a flank and were able to kill Godwinson. If the opportunity didn't present itself at the opportune time, the English would have won. The anglo saxon housecarls were some of the most elite warriors in all of Europe
That should suffice. I will not provide sources because this is a topic I have been studying for a long time and finding everything to verify this would be exhausting at this time of the night (I live in Europe), but every thing is verifiable if you look it up yourself. If you want, I can compile the sources tomorrow
Exhibit B: the normans formed an aristocracy that was incredibly pompous and elitist towards the anglo saxon people. Completely alienating themselves purposefully by speaking an entirely different language (french) that the people could not understand, not teaching them French at all, and sometimes even living in Normandy instead of England.
Exhibit C: the normans forced the English catholic church into much more direct control by the papacy, which was wildly unpopular (eventually this would be the impetus for the people converting to anglicanism), and changed mass from English language mass to Latin mass, which the anglo saxon populace did not understand and did not have the means to learn.
Exhibit D: the normans used genocide to great effect during the harrowing of the North where they burned down farmland, raped and pillaged civilians, and slaughtered every farm animal they could find to reduce the northern english population to virtually nothing just to stamp out a tiny group of rebels that posed no threat. This was very brutal even by medieval standards and mimics the holodomor.
Exhibit E: the normans introduced feudalism to England to enslave the anglo saxon population and keep the norman elite fat, wealthy, and happy. Feudalism would have under normal circumstances been an advancement, but the system introduced by the normans was intentional slavery of the anglo saxons, and English peasants had it quite a bit worse than peasants on the continent because their lords just hated them.
Exhibit F: the normans would be the direct cause of the now hundreds of years old conflict between England and Ireland by invading Ireland for virtually no reason whatsoever, the only reason the normans even gave was a supposed papal bull. This would also be the case for Scotland as well, but the acts of union backtracked this to some degree.
Exhibit G: outlawing the property rights of the anglo saxons. This ties into the feudalism point. The anglo saxons had a strong belief in land ownership and the normans snatched it away from them and divided it among their own elite.
Exhibit H (this list is getting exhaustive): the norman forest laws. The anglo saxon populace was not allowed to cut down trees, own a bow, or hunt animals for food. The punishment for this would be to have the index and middle fingers cut off of the hand. If this isn't proof that they had an unnecessary hatred of the English, I don't know what is. This also ties heavily into the point about English peasants being significantly more fucked over than, say, a French or a German peasant.
Exhibit I: the normans dragged the English along into their stupid, still ongoing territorial disputes in France and would sacrifice, in due time, *millions* of people for territory that they would never even end up gaining in France, and later on, colonial possessions that they never even got control over either. The English conflict with France is actually fucking retarded and the normans were the cause of it. They had a hatred of France because of their ancestors war with the country and wanted to get back at them, and sacrificed the anglo saxons for a cause that never came to fruition at all. It was like the battle of isonzo, but on crack and over the span of nearly a millennium.
Exhibit J: this isn't really a crime against the English, because it never killed anyone or contributed to their slavery, but it annoys me anyways, and it is kind of fucked because it destroyed a culture. The normans filibustered England's dealings with scandinavian states and the scandinavian influence in England in favor of stupid wars with France mentioned prior. The anglo saxon English had a semi-scandinavian culture from dealings with the Norse for close to the entire existence of England. The mercy of alfred the great towards the Danes after the defeat of the latter led to a thriving blend of the 2 cultures (actual, white, multiculturalism) and the hybrid society was an incredibly efficient and vibrant one in just about every way, one of the most in all of Europe. The Normans kind of, you know, fucking destroyed all of it
Another point that doesn't tie into their crimes, but really more addressing your point about them being great conquerors, is that they really weren't. They just took advantage of rare circumstances for a war they otherwise would have lost, badly. The normans invaded from the deep south right after Harold Godwinson emerged victorious from a long war with the vikings in the far flunged northern corner of England. Godwinsons exhausted army covered the distance in a surprisingly short amount of time and came to the battlefield starving, war torn, and exhausted. Despite this, the normans were still losing for most of the battle of hastings, and only won because they took advantage of a flank and were able to kill Godwinson. If the opportunity didn't present itself at the opportune time, the English would have won. The anglo saxon housecarls were some of the most elite warriors in all of Europe
That should suffice. I will not provide sources because this is a topic I have been studying for a long time and finding everything to verify this would be exhausting at this time of the night (I live in Europe), but every thing is verifiable if you look it up yourself. If you want, I can compile the sources tomorrow
Rhodesia is the last embodiment. There was a quote about it "more english than england" and it is correctly. Land owning males were in charge.
Thats why the communists funded rebels and England/US funded the political rivals, Mugabe and other communists.
Thats why the communists funded rebels and England/US funded the political rivals, Mugabe and other communists.
This kikes name was on the South's money.
https://ajhs.org/the-brains-of-the-confederacy-the-life-of-judah-p-benjamin/
You died for a bunch of kikes who were the actual slave traders and big slave owners and they did most of that in the Caribbean and South America. It's where over 90 percent of the slave trade went and auctions were closed on Jewish holidays or there would be no buyers or sellers. Kikes just scapegoat you for it and most people have no clue kikes ran the Dutch trading companies or even that New York was originally New Amsterdam.
Rum, clothing was theirs. You died and were associated with their crimes against humanity so they could have one united country in debt they would never escape and so that any initial resistance could be easily resisted.
You may as well celebrate the two men on a horse faggot Templars who practiced kabbalah, charged interest through loopholes and whose goal was acquiring occult artifacts they thought were in Jerusalem, because they bought Edomite kike revisionist history about Solomon being a fuckin wizard.
https://ajhs.org/the-brains-of-the-confederacy-the-life-of-judah-p-benjamin/
You died for a bunch of kikes who were the actual slave traders and big slave owners and they did most of that in the Caribbean and South America. It's where over 90 percent of the slave trade went and auctions were closed on Jewish holidays or there would be no buyers or sellers. Kikes just scapegoat you for it and most people have no clue kikes ran the Dutch trading companies or even that New York was originally New Amsterdam.
Rum, clothing was theirs. You died and were associated with their crimes against humanity so they could have one united country in debt they would never escape and so that any initial resistance could be easily resisted.
You may as well celebrate the two men on a horse faggot Templars who practiced kabbalah, charged interest through loopholes and whose goal was acquiring occult artifacts they thought were in Jerusalem, because they bought Edomite kike revisionist history about Solomon being a fuckin wizard.
Toast message
If I could build a time machine, I'd go back and tell the South not to rebel at that time. Instead, they should've insisted states rights, acted like belligerents against the North, and when people began to wake up to the degree of jewish infiltration in the US government, they would be the ones to correct the problem.
We handled things in a civilized manner- the Lincolnite (daily reminder that Lincoln was a Jew) Yankees would have none of it, and certainly wouldn't believe that they were wrong. The correct time-machine scenario would be to have Lee swing from a rope before he could sell us out at Antietam, Appomattox, and half a dozen other times besides. Also, do everything possible to help Forrest gain overall command of the Confederate Army.