New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
55
consoom fellow conservatives (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by Coronelington on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +55Score on mirror )
You must log in or sign up to comment
22 comments:
14
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 14 points (+0 / -0 / +14Score on mirror ) 3 children
So the not sees are the good guys? Since “socialism” is what you want?

Also there’s someone s-banned (can’t even say the word) in this comments section.
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
u/#smugler Unscored reveals the truth: https://unscored.arete.network/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1994yGXi6M/
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 2 children
What fucking *community* filter would have censored anything in that post?
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 1 child
Good question, I'm as confused as you are.

At oyvey.negro they don't even allow unscored links.
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
*That* makes perfect sense, of course. It’s run by literal Mossad employees, so they don’t want anyone to know how much censorship goes on over there.
assttaskmanager on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Brand new account. I think the mods have implemented rules for the filter so that it automatically shadowbans comments from new accounts (up to what threshold, I don't know), most likely to combat the accounts that spam porn. They usually restore the comments manually if they're not spam, which is the case in this thread, as the previously shadowbanned comment is now visible.

I also don't think the term shadowban is part of the global filter either, probably just implemented as a community filter in the "non-political" communities.
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
I’ll… try to remember that. I hate having to remember “s-ban” all the time, anyway.
DirlewangerBrigade on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
It was "real socialism" and it did work. All you have to do is call the bankers, landlords and capitalist parasites the (((other thing))) they are.
Captain_Raamsley on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Someone is shadow banned here?
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Yeah, early accounts get their posts automatically blocked by the filter. I just thought it was a later one.
removed 1 year ago 8 points (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror )
deleted 1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Ehh... depends on the definition of "Nazi" or "Socialism". Hitler taught a very different kind of socialism than what was commonly accepted as socialism back then. He was quite explicit that he took the name "Socialist" simply because it was popular and he could use it to describe his philosophy, which was that people have a social responsibility to each other.

Nowadays, what we are told is Nazism has nothing to do with what Hitler taught or did. But hey, even "socialism" has been changed too. Back then people thought government would actually help people, but today only idiots would imagine such a thing.
the-new-style on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
he also called it Socialism to troll Marxists
Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Possible but I am unaware of him overtly stating this as his reasoning.
the-new-style on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Hitler's actual words about "true socialism" can be found in a 1923 interview with George Sylvester Viereck. Here are Hitler's key statements on socialism from that interview:

> Socialism is the science of dealing with the common weal. Communism is not Socialism. Marxism is not Socialism. The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning. I shall take Socialism away from the Socialists. Socialism is an ancient Aryan, Germanic institution. Our German ancestors held certain lands in common. They cultivated the idea of the common weal. Marxism has no right to disguise itself as socialism. Socialism, unlike Marxism, does not repudiate private property. Unlike Marxism, it involves no negation of personality, and unlike Marxism, it is patriotic. We might have called ourselves the Liberal Party. We chose to call ourselves the National Socialists. We are not internationalists. Our socialism is national. We demand the fulfilment of the just claims of the productive classes by the state on the basis of race solidarity. To us state and race are one.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
I guess jews are Nazis then, since they love to push (((socialism))).

deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
the-new-style on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
raises the question, mate, not begs. "Begging the question" means something else entirely
DirlewangerBrigade on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Ethnonationalism and yes. They're bent on world domination because they consider themselves the "master race" (or "God's chosen")
the-new-style on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
"I really am as simple as that"
Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I do not have X but someone should reply back and ask him to define what he thinks socialism is.

Many places where jews are in power exercise what might arguably be defined as socialism according to his own definition.

If you asked 100 people what socialism is, you'd likely get 100 different answers.

> it is interesting to note an interview that George Viereck, father of German-American poet and conservative thinker Peter Viereck, conducted with Adolf Hitler in 1923. When asked to define socialism, Hitler replied: “Socialism is the science dealing with the common weal. Communism is not Socialism. The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning. I shall take Socialism away from the Socialists.” https://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2010/07/hitler-defines-socialism

National Socialism and the Laws of Nature https://westsdarkesthour.com/2023/11/12/national-socialism-and-the-laws-of-nature/

> “…It is Life alone that all things must serve.” —Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. I, Chap. 9, p. 215 (Manheim)

Writing in his book Mein Kampf in 1924, he stated:

> When Man attempts to rebel against the iron logic of Nature, he comes into struggle with the principles to which he himself owes his existence as a man. And so his action against Nature must lead to his own doom… Here we encounter the objection [that] ‘Man’s role is to overcome Nature!’… But Man has never yet conquered Nature in anything, but at most has caught hold of and tried to lift one corner or another of her immense gigantic veil of eternal riddles and secrets, that in reality he invents nothing but only discovers everything, that he does not dominate Nature, but has only risen on the basis of his knowledge of various laws and secrets to be lord over those other living creatures who lack this knowledge… (Vol. I, Chap. 11, Manheim trans., p. 287)

> The goal of National Socialism, then, is to consciously organize human society in accordance with the Natural Order. The postwar Danish National-Socialist Povl H. Riis-Knudsen thus defined National Socialism in a single sentence: “National Socialism is the application of the Laws of Nature to human affairs.”

>In a speech given in 1928, Hitler gave his own one-sentence definition of the National Socialist worldview: “All life is bound up in three theses: struggle is the father of all things, virtue lies in the blood, and leadership is primary and decisive.”
Toast message