They are Legion
(twitter.com)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
1. This leads to normalization, much like if a Pro-white show started interviewing niggers or having nigShows, nigSports, etc… people especially the more impressionable, like the young, will think this is cool and okay
2. Once normalized amongst the masses, which the NPCs are very much sheep, we have found in the modern day that it is very hard to shake them from their ways. Once a source becomes a trusted source it’s already in their feed tube.
3. Conversion is not the answer. Build a church in Africa, give it all resources it needs x100, and give it white priests/pastors to start it/teach the natives to carry on in the tradition for 50-100 years. Then leave it be. That church will be looted, sacked, and bastardized. The same can be said for jews; Spain post-1492 for example, crypto-jewry.
4. This man presents himself as a religious leader. Having a jew as a religious leader is dangerous in general.
A jew-naming jew is a weapon. The military points weapons at enemies, not at its own people.
I understand your argument, and there is logic in using this “weapon” to disrupt the minds of the NPC… but at the end of the day, it’s just another Jewish leader in OUR movement.
Someone down the road from now, “not all Jews are bad! I was converted by a Jew”.
Statistically minded, I don’t like the factors added when using a Jewish weapon. A cleaner, untainted product will be made with a white face to our movement. If we make room for allowances now, it will lead to a spot in the minds of many.
I do not claim to know the intentions of this Jew; but you have to admit the activity is suspicious given their nature. Therefore the most likely reason is subversion
Certainly, given their historically verified behavior, particularly regarding “not being a jew anymore.” However, compare the examples of Brother Nathanael and Laura Loomer. The former holds *no topic* off-limits to discuss the jewish behavior and history thereof. The latter will say, “Yes, 9/11 was an inside job… NO, ISRAEL HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.” *That’s* a limited hang-out.
Other than him being a genetic jew–and therefore intrinsically arousing my permanent suspicion–I’ve seen nothing from BroNat to suggest he’s not genuine. Not a hitch in the “narrative;” not a suspicious bit of silence on any given topic. Certainly he has no place in a "white planet” future, but I’ll take “Not all jews *were* bad; I was made a white nationalist by a jew calling out his brethren” over the guaranteed future we have today.
He postulates himself a sage monk who is “based”. He makes a lot of money through his non-profit, and his target audience is young, easily impressionable teenagers/children, as most of his content is through TikTok and other socials.
I'm not really opposed to /ourguys/ extracting money through/from the system. Being jewish, I'd expect him to have unique insight into how to do that so its not all that surprising
>and his target audience is young, easily impressionable teenagers/children, as most of his content is through TikTok and other socials.
Who then should we be focusing on, boomers? Geriatrics *long* past military age? He who controls the youth controls the future.
-SFAM1A
Do you hear yourself?