Your explanation is actually that the raped kid deserved it because someone outside of their immediate control did something some amount of time ago and led them to that circumstance. I'm saying someone outside of their immediate control did something some amount of time ago, but that person wasn't them in a past life, and that by no means justifies the rape.
A victim of any misfortune is compensated greatly in heaven. A receiver of any fortune in this life has a harder time purifying their soul. That sounds like a pretty good balance of circumstance, dare I say... loved equally?
My explanation is that somebody who was raped as a kid, raped a kid in their previous life.
it makes the most sense.
Otherwise by your model you get harm done upon innocents.
A fair God doesn't allow it to happen.
A fair God doesn't allow harm done upon innocents... to go unpunished. I would just ask you this, who was the first perpetrator of wrongdoing, and who was the first victim. And how does your karmic worldview explain these origins. The first ever victim of rape couldn't have raped in a previous life
1. God loves people.
2. God allows children to be raped and tortured.
pick one, they are mutually exclusive, braindead idiot.
you don't even think. If I watch somebody getting raped and killed and I don't lift a finger it means that I don't love them. unless they deserve it karmically then I won't intervene.
you keep repeating the same garbage but what I say goes above you're head.
1 and 2 are exluding eachother, think bro, think. indians can do it. can you?
They just aren't mutually exclusive. God couldn't love people and do nothing about rape, torture, and all evil, I agree. But allowing it to happen and doing nothing about it aren't the same thing.
Nothing your tiny nigger brain could conjure up would go above anyone's head, you're just too narrow-minded to even comprehend a greater eschatology than "rape victims deserve it." Which explains why you use indians as an example of "people who can think." Get a life retard
you're gay.
A victim of any misfortune is compensated greatly in heaven. A receiver of any fortune in this life has a harder time purifying their soul. That sounds like a pretty good balance of circumstance, dare I say... loved equally?
it makes the most sense.
Otherwise by your model you get harm done upon innocents.
A fair God doesn't allow it to happen.
1. God loves people.
2. God allows children to be raped and tortured.
pick one, they are mutually exclusive, braindead idiot.
you don't even think. If I watch somebody getting raped and killed and I don't lift a finger it means that I don't love them. unless they deserve it karmically then I won't intervene.
you keep repeating the same garbage but what I say goes above you're head.
1 and 2 are exluding eachother, think bro, think. indians can do it. can you?
Nothing your tiny nigger brain could conjure up would go above anyone's head, you're just too narrow-minded to even comprehend a greater eschatology than "rape victims deserve it." Which explains why you use indians as an example of "people who can think." Get a life retard