Nationalism vs Libertarianism:
(media.scored.co)
I thought the whole point of libertarianism is that you do not want to sit like the guy in the first picture, but are forced to because taxes deny any business opportunities.
I don't have any problem with libertarianism, it's just that it would only work in a white ethnostate. Tell white people they have freedom and they will sell raw milk. Tell niggers and spics they have freedom and they will drive drunk and blast their stereo at 3 AM.
For many, including Mussolini, it was th' opposite, if I recall correctly.
He was something else before he became a nationalist, but he was NOT a lolberg.
There isn't a single gateway to it. Libertarianism is an enemy ideology, just like communism is. They can both be gateways but they're both enemies, simultaneously.
There's not just one way to end up here and not everyone who comes to this point will come because of the exact same realization. There's multiple points of entry and different people will end up here because of different frustrations.
Some people don't have political gateways. Hitler had none. He had no real prior political career or beliefs before he joined the DAP. The DAP was his gateway. He was inspired by mussolini later on but he had no prior political conditioning and he joined the DAP before Italy was fascist. Anton Drexler didn't build on much either.
Some people never will. Most people never will. Most libertarians will stay libertarians or backtrack to something else, but still entirely moderate. Most communists will stay communist or backtrack to somewhere else more moderate as well. It takes conviction to end up at this point, conviction that most people don't have.