1 year ago19 points(+0/-0/+19Score on mirror)3 children
Even *if* women readily volunteered to fight in wars (they shouldn't), they still should not be allowed to vote simply because they are *not capable* of being led by facts, logic, and reasoning (generally speaking), but instead are led by emotions.
1 year ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)1 child
>I had a girl be pissy at me for almost 2 days because she dreamed I cheated on her.
Perhaps I should clarify
\>My good fellow, I am quite vexed at such an intolerable action and feel immensely sorry for you on your behalf that you had to endure such irrational and illogical behavior at the hands of a member of the fairer sex. It is quite a shame that they are like that, and it is for this reason that I wholeheartedly agree to your notion that the revocation of the 19th amendment to the United States Constitution would be a favorable action in the near future.
That is not even the biggest issue.
It's that men are biologically wired to take care of women, therefore men would never do something against women. Men don't see themselves as separate group.
Ask any libtard what exactly would change for women if women lost the right to vote tomorrow. Would men introduce a tampon tax?
Women on the other hand are not able to love men the way men love women, therefore if only women could vote they would treat us men like a foreign enemy.
Women voting breaks society in two opposing factions. If women didn't vote, society would be more united and men would take care of women's needs.
There were literal anti-voting women leagues, suffrage and feminism were astroturfed *hard*. In England, the suffragettes were literal commie terrorists who bombed churches and shamed their men for not wanting to fight pointless brother wars. Had the (((press))) not been on the side of feminism, it would have fizzled out for being completely insane on its face. But (((governments))) wanted a bigger tax base, and (((corporations))) wanted cheaper labor, so feminism was normalized.
Charity is not giving random handouts to strangers for public clout as this modern day Pharisee believes, it is simply willing the Good of your fellow man for the sake of God.
To desire to preserve your people is an act of Charity, to fight and expose evil is an act of Charity. To allow people, especially women, to participate in a Satanic charade of government is not Charitable, it is evil. These hypocrites project their own belief in empty works on to the Catholic Church, not realizing it is they who lack both faith and works and will be disowned by Christ unless they seek the truth and repent.
Perhaps I should clarify
\>My good fellow, I am quite vexed at such an intolerable action and feel immensely sorry for you on your behalf that you had to endure such irrational and illogical behavior at the hands of a member of the fairer sex. It is quite a shame that they are like that, and it is for this reason that I wholeheartedly agree to your notion that the revocation of the 19th amendment to the United States Constitution would be a favorable action in the near future.
"Oof" was just faster.
It's that men are biologically wired to take care of women, therefore men would never do something against women. Men don't see themselves as separate group.
Ask any libtard what exactly would change for women if women lost the right to vote tomorrow. Would men introduce a tampon tax?
Women on the other hand are not able to love men the way men love women, therefore if only women could vote they would treat us men like a foreign enemy.
Women voting breaks society in two opposing factions. If women didn't vote, society would be more united and men would take care of women's needs.
Men got the right to vote only after it was established that they had a duty to go die in war.
Women voting is the gravest injustice in history. Women can vote for a war that men will have to fight.