New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
62
posted 1 year ago by Brannvesen on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +62Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
ChargedUpCharger on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
It's foolish to assume that you are immune to their tactics. What percentage of people think they *are* effected by ads? I'd wager not many. And yet, the ads do have a strong and measurable effect on consumer habits.
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
This also reminds me of boycotts, see every time an attempt is made to boycott a brand, they only tell you what brand not to buy. Notice how nobody mentions the alternatives, if people need the product and don't know what other vendors sells it the boycott has essentially failed. And that's the true danger of ads.

As long as you have no default (((merchant))) in mind when thinking of a specific type of product, you'd be forced to search for vendors yourself, and will easily find the alternatives who are superior compared to kikes who spam ads 24x7.
BlueDrache on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
The problem with boycotts, is people will buy alternatives ... but those alts are owned by the same parent company that's being boycotted.

Example - Bud Light.

AnBev also owns a shitton of other popular brands that many people switched to.
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Yep, also a big problem.
Toast message