1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)2 children
> Online T&Cs are a bluff. Pretty much anything is without legal counsel present during signing, and no notarization.
WRONG, u/fellowwhites.
===
Same trick worked for a wife KILLED PROVABLY by Disney negligence in 2024, due to updated terms and conditions of STREAMING DISNEY+ FREE TRIAL TV, a ploy that worked. No trial attempt for killed wife on Disney property, only (((private arbitration)))!!!!
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
Yea Terms and Conditions, while legal, become unusable and thrown out when it's not clear, its illegal or too broad. That's why terms that go "you can't sue" aren't legally binding. The Disney case is more of an issue of having to fight a company with the ability to field almost an army's amount of legal agents. Disney would and is pushing the terms narrative but if this went to trial it would most likely not stick but it wouldn't stop Disney from dragging the man and the courts the whole way till the other side runs out of cash or scares them to just give up.
WRONG, u/fellowwhites.
===
Same trick worked for a wife KILLED PROVABLY by Disney negligence in 2024, due to updated terms and conditions of STREAMING DISNEY+ FREE TRIAL TV, a ploy that worked. No trial attempt for killed wife on Disney property, only (((private arbitration)))!!!!
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2024/08/15/disney-wrongful-death-lawsuit-arbitration/74805949007/
Well, does that mean he couldn't go to trial, or that he *thought* he couldn't?
True. But that being said, I think there are thousands of people who would crowd fund this guy, just to see disney getting fucked.