I won't cover what modern morality really is. I think a lot of you have figured out that "good" and "evil" don't mean what you think they should mean.
A lot of you probably have a hard time connecting the dots on what "good" and "evil" actually are, and so occasionally I try to write a post here to explain it.
All I can say is read the Bible. There's really no way you can understand what good and evil are without putting yourself in a time machine and reading about what people did a long time ago before modern morality was even conceived of.
Today I'd like to point out a contrast I recently realized. It may seem obvious to you, but keep in mind the last time I had to spend significant time dealing with our common enemy was probably back in high school. Since then, I've isolated myself from the cancer by focusing on math and science and computer programming, and I've never had any reason to spend any significant time with a marxist outside of working hours.
Here is my realization: They really only care about feelings. THEIR feelings, not yours. Anything that makes them feel uncomfortable is evil. Anything that makes them feel happy is good.
If you're like me, this is a big deal. Nothing could be further than my ethos than this concept. In fact, I have spent my entire life coaching my emotions to match my reason, so that I feel disgust and hatred towards evil, and pleasant emotions towards good. Thus, to me, seeing someone do something good inspires a good response from me, especially when such an act is "selfless" or rather benefits society and the individual equally. ("selflessness" can be taken to an extreme in which case it becomes evil.)
Anyway, here's how I'd have to deal with such people. I would consider every thought, every action, and carefully try to figure out what their emotional response would be. Then I would carefully choose the course of action that would make them feel the best about themselves without spoiling any of their pre-conceived notions. I would have to be very careful not to expose my own morality, because if they got a hint that I was manipulating their emotions, they would probably feel bad. Unless, of course, I could convince them that I was the epitome of goodness and righteousness and virtue, in which case they would feel bad for not agreeing with me 100% of the time.
Since I don't have the ability to pretend to be a paragon of virtue, I would probably end up getting found out and people feeling bad around me all the time, because they know that I don't match their ideas about what good should be. So eventually, I would have to part company with them (or fight and destroy them somehow.)
These are the sorts of people you are dealing with. It's all about THEIR feelings, THEIR emotions, and logic and reason don't enter into it.
How to deal with such people? I am not sure, but I know that speaking the truth must be part of it.
I remember vaguely that I had a victory of sorts when I explained that I have my own language, culture, and religion and family, and they are just as important as anyone else. And when they try to force me to act a certain way or say certain things, that hurts me and my people. I think at that point there was a vague glimmer of hope that perhaps they would "accept me for who I am" or some such nonsense, but I found the whole thing ridiculous. I vaguely recall it had something to do with the mormon / LDS equivalent of the "trail of tears", which honestly I don't feel bad about in the slightest.
Now, on to true morality. What makes something good or bad has nothing to do with feelings. It doesn't matter how so-and-so feels about anything, and to regard anyone's feelings is to elevate them to the position of a god-like creature. After all, what makes something good is God wants us to do it, and what makes it evil is God doesn't want us to do it. That's it, plain and simple. Only God's feelings matter. If we align with him, that is good, if not, then we are evil, and he is good.
You have to be careful because I see the same mind-rot entering into "conservative" circles, especially those of us who know who the enemy is. Do not think, for one minute, that your feelings matter. If you are feeling sad or depressed -- so what? If you are feeling happy, so what? These things don't matter, and never did. All that matters is whether you are doing the right thing.
If this feels cold and heartless, it's because you have grown cold and heartless. You are wrong to think emotions matter. Emotions are, at best, a tool that can be used to motivate you, if you allow yourself to control them. If you allow them to control you, you are a slave to them! Those who know how to manipulate emotions can manipulate you if you allow emotions to control you!
Anger -- do not allow it to dictate your actions. Use your anger when it is necessary, but do not allow it to make important decisions, especially in the moment of fury.
Hatred -- do not allow the things you hate to dominate your thinking. Allowing the object of your hate to consume your thoughts is to make yourself a slave to your hatred.
Passion / Lust -- if the target of your lust is anywhere but your spouse, it is misdirected. This powerful emotion can be used to cement the husband-wife relationship and bring new life in the world. Misused, it destroys families.
Sadness / depression -- you are sad because you live in a fallen world. Allow the victory of Christ to swallow that up and replace sorrow with happiness. If depression consumes you, you are controlled by the evil state of this world, and forever condemned to be a slave to it.
Joy / Pleasure -- pure joy and happiness is wonderful, but you should not make it the motivating factor. There are things to be done where there is no joy. To pursue entertainment and vain pleasures is to waste your life in vanity.
So on and so forth.
Our superpower as white people is our ability to reason about our emotions, rather than let our emotions dominate us. Reasoning about them allows us to conquer them, subdue them, control them, and even use them to your own benefit.
A lot of you probably have a hard time connecting the dots on what "good" and "evil" actually are, and so occasionally I try to write a post here to explain it.
All I can say is read the Bible. There's really no way you can understand what good and evil are without putting yourself in a time machine and reading about what people did a long time ago before modern morality was even conceived of.
Today I'd like to point out a contrast I recently realized. It may seem obvious to you, but keep in mind the last time I had to spend significant time dealing with our common enemy was probably back in high school. Since then, I've isolated myself from the cancer by focusing on math and science and computer programming, and I've never had any reason to spend any significant time with a marxist outside of working hours.
Here is my realization: They really only care about feelings. THEIR feelings, not yours. Anything that makes them feel uncomfortable is evil. Anything that makes them feel happy is good.
If you're like me, this is a big deal. Nothing could be further than my ethos than this concept. In fact, I have spent my entire life coaching my emotions to match my reason, so that I feel disgust and hatred towards evil, and pleasant emotions towards good. Thus, to me, seeing someone do something good inspires a good response from me, especially when such an act is "selfless" or rather benefits society and the individual equally. ("selflessness" can be taken to an extreme in which case it becomes evil.)
Anyway, here's how I'd have to deal with such people. I would consider every thought, every action, and carefully try to figure out what their emotional response would be. Then I would carefully choose the course of action that would make them feel the best about themselves without spoiling any of their pre-conceived notions. I would have to be very careful not to expose my own morality, because if they got a hint that I was manipulating their emotions, they would probably feel bad. Unless, of course, I could convince them that I was the epitome of goodness and righteousness and virtue, in which case they would feel bad for not agreeing with me 100% of the time.
Since I don't have the ability to pretend to be a paragon of virtue, I would probably end up getting found out and people feeling bad around me all the time, because they know that I don't match their ideas about what good should be. So eventually, I would have to part company with them (or fight and destroy them somehow.)
These are the sorts of people you are dealing with. It's all about THEIR feelings, THEIR emotions, and logic and reason don't enter into it.
How to deal with such people? I am not sure, but I know that speaking the truth must be part of it.
I remember vaguely that I had a victory of sorts when I explained that I have my own language, culture, and religion and family, and they are just as important as anyone else. And when they try to force me to act a certain way or say certain things, that hurts me and my people. I think at that point there was a vague glimmer of hope that perhaps they would "accept me for who I am" or some such nonsense, but I found the whole thing ridiculous. I vaguely recall it had something to do with the mormon / LDS equivalent of the "trail of tears", which honestly I don't feel bad about in the slightest.
Now, on to true morality. What makes something good or bad has nothing to do with feelings. It doesn't matter how so-and-so feels about anything, and to regard anyone's feelings is to elevate them to the position of a god-like creature. After all, what makes something good is God wants us to do it, and what makes it evil is God doesn't want us to do it. That's it, plain and simple. Only God's feelings matter. If we align with him, that is good, if not, then we are evil, and he is good.
You have to be careful because I see the same mind-rot entering into "conservative" circles, especially those of us who know who the enemy is. Do not think, for one minute, that your feelings matter. If you are feeling sad or depressed -- so what? If you are feeling happy, so what? These things don't matter, and never did. All that matters is whether you are doing the right thing.
If this feels cold and heartless, it's because you have grown cold and heartless. You are wrong to think emotions matter. Emotions are, at best, a tool that can be used to motivate you, if you allow yourself to control them. If you allow them to control you, you are a slave to them! Those who know how to manipulate emotions can manipulate you if you allow emotions to control you!
Anger -- do not allow it to dictate your actions. Use your anger when it is necessary, but do not allow it to make important decisions, especially in the moment of fury.
Hatred -- do not allow the things you hate to dominate your thinking. Allowing the object of your hate to consume your thoughts is to make yourself a slave to your hatred.
Passion / Lust -- if the target of your lust is anywhere but your spouse, it is misdirected. This powerful emotion can be used to cement the husband-wife relationship and bring new life in the world. Misused, it destroys families.
Sadness / depression -- you are sad because you live in a fallen world. Allow the victory of Christ to swallow that up and replace sorrow with happiness. If depression consumes you, you are controlled by the evil state of this world, and forever condemned to be a slave to it.
Joy / Pleasure -- pure joy and happiness is wonderful, but you should not make it the motivating factor. There are things to be done where there is no joy. To pursue entertainment and vain pleasures is to waste your life in vanity.
So on and so forth.
Our superpower as white people is our ability to reason about our emotions, rather than let our emotions dominate us. Reasoning about them allows us to conquer them, subdue them, control them, and even use them to your own benefit.
Cultures and religions rise and fail according to relative fertility. Small differences in birth rates compound over time, unless you have solid barriers to migration.
If morality isn't fertility, then it would become so over generations anyways. You can't have the moral high ground while going extinct, can you? No, fertile families pass down fertile morals and eventually take over while trannies and faggots self-destruct. They are exactly as evil as suicide bombers, they expend their life trying to make others infertile, which affects the gene pool the same way as murder.
Well, disgust is the natural response to such evil, and disgust is ancestral advice to clean it up or get away.
Anyway there's real danger in losing most of the gene pool through memetic tricks that discourage larger families (like 4+ kids), but it can only go so far before it snaps back. By being violently oppressive enforcing key ideas, you can get memetic spread that exceeds genetic spread.