I won't cover what modern morality really is. I think a lot of you have figured out that "good" and "evil" don't mean what you think they should mean.
A lot of you probably have a hard time connecting the dots on what "good" and "evil" actually are, and so occasionally I try to write a post here to explain it.
All I can say is read the Bible. There's really no way you can understand what good and evil are without putting yourself in a time machine and reading about what people did a long time ago before modern morality was even conceived of.
Today I'd like to point out a contrast I recently realized. It may seem obvious to you, but keep in mind the last time I had to spend significant time dealing with our common enemy was probably back in high school. Since then, I've isolated myself from the cancer by focusing on math and science and computer programming, and I've never had any reason to spend any significant time with a marxist outside of working hours.
Here is my realization: They really only care about feelings. THEIR feelings, not yours. Anything that makes them feel uncomfortable is evil. Anything that makes them feel happy is good.
If you're like me, this is a big deal. Nothing could be further than my ethos than this concept. In fact, I have spent my entire life coaching my emotions to match my reason, so that I feel disgust and hatred towards evil, and pleasant emotions towards good. Thus, to me, seeing someone do something good inspires a good response from me, especially when such an act is "selfless" or rather benefits society and the individual equally. ("selflessness" can be taken to an extreme in which case it becomes evil.)
Anyway, here's how I'd have to deal with such people. I would consider every thought, every action, and carefully try to figure out what their emotional response would be. Then I would carefully choose the course of action that would make them feel the best about themselves without spoiling any of their pre-conceived notions. I would have to be very careful not to expose my own morality, because if they got a hint that I was manipulating their emotions, they would probably feel bad. Unless, of course, I could convince them that I was the epitome of goodness and righteousness and virtue, in which case they would feel bad for not agreeing with me 100% of the time.
Since I don't have the ability to pretend to be a paragon of virtue, I would probably end up getting found out and people feeling bad around me all the time, because they know that I don't match their ideas about what good should be. So eventually, I would have to part company with them (or fight and destroy them somehow.)
These are the sorts of people you are dealing with. It's all about THEIR feelings, THEIR emotions, and logic and reason don't enter into it.
How to deal with such people? I am not sure, but I know that speaking the truth must be part of it.
I remember vaguely that I had a victory of sorts when I explained that I have my own language, culture, and religion and family, and they are just as important as anyone else. And when they try to force me to act a certain way or say certain things, that hurts me and my people. I think at that point there was a vague glimmer of hope that perhaps they would "accept me for who I am" or some such nonsense, but I found the whole thing ridiculous. I vaguely recall it had something to do with the mormon / LDS equivalent of the "trail of tears", which honestly I don't feel bad about in the slightest.
Now, on to true morality. What makes something good or bad has nothing to do with feelings. It doesn't matter how so-and-so feels about anything, and to regard anyone's feelings is to elevate them to the position of a god-like creature. After all, what makes something good is God wants us to do it, and what makes it evil is God doesn't want us to do it. That's it, plain and simple. Only God's feelings matter. If we align with him, that is good, if not, then we are evil, and he is good.
You have to be careful because I see the same mind-rot entering into "conservative" circles, especially those of us who know who the enemy is. Do not think, for one minute, that your feelings matter. If you are feeling sad or depressed -- so what? If you are feeling happy, so what? These things don't matter, and never did. All that matters is whether you are doing the right thing.
If this feels cold and heartless, it's because you have grown cold and heartless. You are wrong to think emotions matter. Emotions are, at best, a tool that can be used to motivate you, if you allow yourself to control them. If you allow them to control you, you are a slave to them! Those who know how to manipulate emotions can manipulate you if you allow emotions to control you!
Anger -- do not allow it to dictate your actions. Use your anger when it is necessary, but do not allow it to make important decisions, especially in the moment of fury.
Hatred -- do not allow the things you hate to dominate your thinking. Allowing the object of your hate to consume your thoughts is to make yourself a slave to your hatred.
Passion / Lust -- if the target of your lust is anywhere but your spouse, it is misdirected. This powerful emotion can be used to cement the husband-wife relationship and bring new life in the world. Misused, it destroys families.
Sadness / depression -- you are sad because you live in a fallen world. Allow the victory of Christ to swallow that up and replace sorrow with happiness. If depression consumes you, you are controlled by the evil state of this world, and forever condemned to be a slave to it.
Joy / Pleasure -- pure joy and happiness is wonderful, but you should not make it the motivating factor. There are things to be done where there is no joy. To pursue entertainment and vain pleasures is to waste your life in vanity.
So on and so forth.
Our superpower as white people is our ability to reason about our emotions, rather than let our emotions dominate us. Reasoning about them allows us to conquer them, subdue them, control them, and even use them to your own benefit.
A lot of you probably have a hard time connecting the dots on what "good" and "evil" actually are, and so occasionally I try to write a post here to explain it.
All I can say is read the Bible. There's really no way you can understand what good and evil are without putting yourself in a time machine and reading about what people did a long time ago before modern morality was even conceived of.
Today I'd like to point out a contrast I recently realized. It may seem obvious to you, but keep in mind the last time I had to spend significant time dealing with our common enemy was probably back in high school. Since then, I've isolated myself from the cancer by focusing on math and science and computer programming, and I've never had any reason to spend any significant time with a marxist outside of working hours.
Here is my realization: They really only care about feelings. THEIR feelings, not yours. Anything that makes them feel uncomfortable is evil. Anything that makes them feel happy is good.
If you're like me, this is a big deal. Nothing could be further than my ethos than this concept. In fact, I have spent my entire life coaching my emotions to match my reason, so that I feel disgust and hatred towards evil, and pleasant emotions towards good. Thus, to me, seeing someone do something good inspires a good response from me, especially when such an act is "selfless" or rather benefits society and the individual equally. ("selflessness" can be taken to an extreme in which case it becomes evil.)
Anyway, here's how I'd have to deal with such people. I would consider every thought, every action, and carefully try to figure out what their emotional response would be. Then I would carefully choose the course of action that would make them feel the best about themselves without spoiling any of their pre-conceived notions. I would have to be very careful not to expose my own morality, because if they got a hint that I was manipulating their emotions, they would probably feel bad. Unless, of course, I could convince them that I was the epitome of goodness and righteousness and virtue, in which case they would feel bad for not agreeing with me 100% of the time.
Since I don't have the ability to pretend to be a paragon of virtue, I would probably end up getting found out and people feeling bad around me all the time, because they know that I don't match their ideas about what good should be. So eventually, I would have to part company with them (or fight and destroy them somehow.)
These are the sorts of people you are dealing with. It's all about THEIR feelings, THEIR emotions, and logic and reason don't enter into it.
How to deal with such people? I am not sure, but I know that speaking the truth must be part of it.
I remember vaguely that I had a victory of sorts when I explained that I have my own language, culture, and religion and family, and they are just as important as anyone else. And when they try to force me to act a certain way or say certain things, that hurts me and my people. I think at that point there was a vague glimmer of hope that perhaps they would "accept me for who I am" or some such nonsense, but I found the whole thing ridiculous. I vaguely recall it had something to do with the mormon / LDS equivalent of the "trail of tears", which honestly I don't feel bad about in the slightest.
Now, on to true morality. What makes something good or bad has nothing to do with feelings. It doesn't matter how so-and-so feels about anything, and to regard anyone's feelings is to elevate them to the position of a god-like creature. After all, what makes something good is God wants us to do it, and what makes it evil is God doesn't want us to do it. That's it, plain and simple. Only God's feelings matter. If we align with him, that is good, if not, then we are evil, and he is good.
You have to be careful because I see the same mind-rot entering into "conservative" circles, especially those of us who know who the enemy is. Do not think, for one minute, that your feelings matter. If you are feeling sad or depressed -- so what? If you are feeling happy, so what? These things don't matter, and never did. All that matters is whether you are doing the right thing.
If this feels cold and heartless, it's because you have grown cold and heartless. You are wrong to think emotions matter. Emotions are, at best, a tool that can be used to motivate you, if you allow yourself to control them. If you allow them to control you, you are a slave to them! Those who know how to manipulate emotions can manipulate you if you allow emotions to control you!
Anger -- do not allow it to dictate your actions. Use your anger when it is necessary, but do not allow it to make important decisions, especially in the moment of fury.
Hatred -- do not allow the things you hate to dominate your thinking. Allowing the object of your hate to consume your thoughts is to make yourself a slave to your hatred.
Passion / Lust -- if the target of your lust is anywhere but your spouse, it is misdirected. This powerful emotion can be used to cement the husband-wife relationship and bring new life in the world. Misused, it destroys families.
Sadness / depression -- you are sad because you live in a fallen world. Allow the victory of Christ to swallow that up and replace sorrow with happiness. If depression consumes you, you are controlled by the evil state of this world, and forever condemned to be a slave to it.
Joy / Pleasure -- pure joy and happiness is wonderful, but you should not make it the motivating factor. There are things to be done where there is no joy. To pursue entertainment and vain pleasures is to waste your life in vanity.
So on and so forth.
Our superpower as white people is our ability to reason about our emotions, rather than let our emotions dominate us. Reasoning about them allows us to conquer them, subdue them, control them, and even use them to your own benefit.
I think it is indeed hard to pinpoint, but I try to frame it in general terms. "Good" may be what is good for you, your family, your race. Good may be something that doesn't seek to exploit weaknesses, doesn't rely on tricks, doesn't play on emotions or tries to tempt into bad habits like addictions. It is normal that certain economic actions may benefit some more than others. So even if you are just a farmer, you selling stuff will have a negative impact of others who may no longer be able to sell their stuff. But that's just market competition, and we cannot blame anyone for doing it right/better.
As of evil, I'd categorize it in varying magnitudes.
1: Exploiting loopholes, acting on the edge of rules/the law, seeking unfairness, but with the purpose of self-interest. I don't think this is an actual problem - evading taxes and bad laws isn't morally bad. If there would be good laws, it's different - like evading restrictions to gambling, addictions, pornography, pedophilia, etc - that is already tapping into the area of amorality.
2: Exploiting shortcomings in humans. This goes into the area of fraud, close-to-fraud, temptations of bad behaviors, exploitation, trickery, insurance fraud (meaning the fraud insurances like to do), lying, deceiving. They'll blame you for you not being smart, knowledgeable, wise enough - "if I wouldn't have done it, someone else would have" + "he learned his lesson the easy way this time." Add to that the proclivity to throw money for lawsuits at "enemies", plus playing word games for legal reasons. The purpose is still self-interest, but it is engulfed in malicious behavior.
3: Cause harm for the sake of it. There are certain behaviors that are not self-interested and may even endanger it in the pursuit of causing harm to others. It doesn't even follow a deeper plan, it doesn't even require intelligence. It just requires the right opportunity, or a moment of impulse. Assaulting, looting, beating someone up, raping are examples.
4: Cause harm for the sake of it in groups. Like 3., but add to that that there are multiple of your kin doing it, thus agreeing with it and participating. Normally your peers would talk you out of it, dampen your ambitions or stop you, but in this case, they do the opposite.
5: Collective destruction. Causing damage to culture, society, economy on a large scale purposefully. It's not about causing harm to individuals themselves, but about doing a little damage to most people. Abortions are a good example: Instead of making a woman abort, push abortion on a political realm to make it legal. This includes the pushing of foreigners in media, spreading lies and being as deceptive as possible, pushing ideology, pushing degeneracy, destroying culture, destroying history, legalizing-politicizing bad behaviors. Bringing in people who do 3. and 4. is also an example (which is why it's higher ranked). While the goal is collective self-interest of a certain group of people one is a member of, it is fundamentally rooted in the destruction of others. It is essentially an ethnic war, but it seeks to hide its nature, so the only participants of the war is that side, and the side that doesn't even know about it.
1 applies to Whites.
1, 2, 3, 4 applies to blacks, gypsies, Indians, Arabs (gypsies trick grandmas, Indians run a plethora of scams, and gang rapes (of White women) are known among blacks, Indians and Arabs).
1, 2, 5 applies to jews, and through 5 it also leads to 3 and 4 indirectly.
No. None of that is good. It's the easy way. Doing nothing, avoiding emotional burden or remain comfortable is not good. To do good is at least as difficult as it is to do evil, and it MUST draw the opposition of evil, which will leverage the forces of good against you. To do good means you have to defy all odds, even your own people. To do good you must be the one doing what needs to be done.
And it requires you to do sacrifices.