New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
104
posted 1 year ago by RJ567 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +104Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
GenghisCohen on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
No if it's a nationalist democracy.
deleted 1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
xsept on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
Calling the modern countries "democracies" is like calling a certain liquid "safe and effective" – it's a nice marketing stunt, but it has nothing to do with reality.


The real, Athenian democracy was a good system. With approximately 10% of the society making decisions, it was the perfect mix between oligarchy (1%) and idiocracy (100%). And you could always exile the politicians working against the society's interest.


It's tragic that there are no truly democratic countries in the world today. The word is being twisted by the usual suspects.
deleted 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
xsept on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
It's not just jews. You have to include the people benefitting* from the pseudodemocratic system. That includes shabbos goyim, women, blacks, sub-100 IQ idiots, and the remaining "cream of the crop". Sure, without jews there would be no issue – but sometimes it's easier to use an overarching euphemism for all these people who shouldn't have a say in running the country.


*when I wrote "benefitting", I obviously meant their ability to put a cross next to a selected pedo's name every few years; I didn't mean the real benefits.
Toast message