1 year ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)3 children
Car dependency more than car culture. It's one thing to like cars, to admire the engineering and machinery for what it is, to modify them. It's another thing when the government arrest you for the crime of walking and design cities in a way that no other mode of transport is realistically viable.
Pay attention now, some green muppets are kvetching about banning all diesel cars that is between 10-15 years old. Then they wanna tax any car that is older than 15 years more than it's market value, meaning you'll have to buy back your old car every year essentially, or trash it for $1000, which ironically requires it to be in perfect condition. Which means they're likely just selling it to some third world country.
1 year ago8 points(+0/-0/+8Score on mirror)5 children
Car-reliant architecture in the US is something that even we here at conpro fail to see how Jewish it is.
In order to live in the US, you need to buy a $20,000+ 2 ton vehicle. Cars make everything noisy and polluted. They make us fatter, and you have to share the road with an ever increasing amount of uninsured niggers and spics.
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
From what I've seen Conpro is extremely based about cars. I think we're all in agreement that once the nigger problem is dealt with we can go back to relatively dense living.
Communists want to ban cars so that niggers can easily kill us.
We want to remove cars because we're not fatties and wish to walk.
If your wife tries fucking other people then that's your fault honestly. Besides, after a real day of the rope I'd think adultery would be illegal. Women hate breaking laws.
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)2 children
With (((debt))) that ensures the fixed monthly cost is usually higher than cost of use, meaning you're more likely to drive to more places as you're gonna be paying for the damn thing either way. Which means higher likelihood of driving to a big box store instead of walking to local nearby shops like the baker, slaughter, fruit stand and the liquor store. Which can all be done in 15 minutes, while a drive to a big box grocery store can take over an hour.
We're wasting time and money to make (((them))) richer. Sadly in many places the development has gone too far, most people have never even seen a local store within walking distance. They haven't seen a small village school, which is practically home schooling, a small house in the village with just a few dozen kids, all of them walk to school. Or how about a neighborhood with a decent amount of houses were you can walk outside any time of the day and only hear birdsong, no lawnmowers, no leaf blowers, no trucks without retarder slowing down on a lifted freeway.
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
Let me guess, you did all the research, found a good location and would have succeeded with your bakery. If it wasn't stopped by zoning laws "*oy vey!, you can't just open a bakery in a residential area*", and minimum parking "*oy vey! you must have 50 parking spaces for your bakery because you have 25 chairs*".
Even tho realistically, few people is gonna drive long way to visit a mom and pop shop. The whole thing by design basically ruins the very idea of a high trust society. A local bakery serving a local community is gonna have plenty of regulars, people you can trust to not jew you. People who may become your frens.
But with plenty of customers coming from far away it's the anonymity of a big city, you don't know the people that arrive by car, they could be thieves, niggers, gypsies or jews trying to jew you. Not to mention that such crappy infrastructure also means that if you call the cops, they're gonna take hours to come because they're too far away. In a small community you'll likely have a local cop, someone you know, who care about the community over stupid laws.
Ok but as someone who lives in a small rural town I can tell you that if you don't keep your lawn mowed you start getting invaded by pests pretty damn fast.
I did get an electric lawn mower recently though, and that thing is so quiet. It's nice 😌
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Ironically these pests, the most annoying ones at least is attracted to goyslop and the chemicals put in processed food. It has nothing to do with your lawn, in fact if you add more bushes, trees and flowers, those will take care of much of the pest, provide nutrients and make your lawn healthier while also draining rainwater properly. Meaning you'll only have to cut your lawn once per week and it'll remain nice enough for golf at all time.
As for electric lawnmowers, they are more silent than gas powered ones, but they're still noisy, in a quiet place you'll hear them from far away too.
I do have a lot of flowers, bushes and trees, and i never use toxic chemicals on my yard. Also, I do only cut my lawn once a week. Believe it or not, despite all the frogs, birds and occasional snakes in my yard, the mosquitos still get obnoxious very quickly if I don't keep it mowed.
If you want to come scythe my yard, be my guest. I'd rather dedicate that time to hanging out with my wife and kids.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
>genuinely good idea
>vote
What?
Besides, rural places are where roads are needed. The real issue with cars is urban areas where retarded "stroads" and zoning laws destroy what should be pedestrian-oriented metropolitan areas.
The real solution is remove niggers from cities, make it easy to get around without a car, but leave countryside highways so that people can easily travel from the city when desired.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Well I'm not saying remove roads from cities entirely, we just need to make them inconvenient for commuting and prioritize pedestrians and trams instead, just like how it worked in the past.
'Car dependency' and 'car culture' are synonyms in my opinion. You're thinking of 'car enthusiasts'.
The second half of your comment reminds me of Cash for Clunkers back in 2009. Jews destroyed millions of reliable old cars so we'd be forced into debt driving their modern shitboxes. Go watch Russian dash cam videos, many people over there still drive cars from the 90s or earlier to this day because *their government didn't destroy all the old cars.* It's extremely rare to see a good old vehicle in the US today.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)2 children
We have sky ways in Minnesota in the bigger cities. It's just a bridge between buildings that's insulated against the weather. It's generally nice during working hours to get around. Get off the street, walk into the lobby of another building and then find the food court.
Many stores no longer want to have direct access to sky ways because of niggers. Niggers walk in, steal shit, walk off back to the sky way and eventually to a parking garage. Or even the druggies who try to sleep in the skyways who scare off all of the shoppers and people doing business.
I used to visit Trier quite a bit when I lived in Germany. The city was not designed for American sized vehicles. I think I walked every block of that city. There was a train station there. Outside the transtation was a hub for cars to drop off and pick up people. To get to the other side where the shops were, you had to walk into an underground tunnel going completely under the high way.
Once faced with such problems there's a solution, and there's a (((solution))).
The (((solution))) involves getting rid of the sky ways.
The solution means getting rid of the niggers while keeping the sky ways which will once again thrive.
I find it ironic that America often choose the (((solution))) when it comes to infrastructure. But when it comes to guns everyone suddenly knows it's the niggers, and even push for more guns for everyone.
1 year ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)1 child
Most people also don't realize that it's is all the big infrastructure required for car dependency that makes a lot of things more expensive, homes, property taxes and rent just to mention a few. Rent in jew york is on average 5 times higher than London, Paris and Moscow.
And among these cities, jew york has the crappiest infrastructure, richest city in the world yet can't even maintain it's most basic infrastructure such as roads, water and sewage, power, drainage, metro system and so on.
Once not every trip ever made requires a car, which has to drive around the whole superblock just to get to a nearby property via centralized big roads. A lot of traffic will disappear, and bad drivers too. Which means, when you do need to or want to drive somewhere, the road will be in perfect condition and have almost no traffic.
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
Just like the old days. BTW, [Chicago -93](https://oyvei.raccoons.space/2022/04/02/61af5993397d864bbe5b5df4a0944499.webp), Amtrak had plans to deploy high speed trains allover America 30 years ago but didn't. (((Something))) stopped them.
Amtrak doesn't own any track. It doesn't work in the US because freight always has right if way since they're the only companies making actual money to maintain the track.
Which is a shame, railroads should be owned and maintained by the government, just like highways and roads. Amtrak should be privately owned, and so should the freight companies. But with relevant regulation to ensure no unsafe trains are out there.
My dream is for cities to be anti-car while still having highway infrastructure to easily go on roadtrips. Of course the only way to start restoring cities is to remove niggers first.