Consume Product

There is no such thing as "sexist" and "racist." There is only the concept of hospitality which variably applies. These "-ism" words are all made up. They seek to put people into categories, and when you criticize them, the -isms of that category are used to label you.

Oh, you criticize an obese, jewish faggot? Ok, let's look at the list: fatphobe, homophobe, antisemite. No, we don't talk about your criticism or reasoning that are directed against the individual person. Because you are now labeled things, you are disqualified from making criticisms. Which basically means only subhumans/retards **of the same type** can criticize each other... which basically means nobody can criticize anybody, because they made up like thousands of these categories.

This is the retarded thinking pattern behind that. What do you think, who is more qualified to talk about foreigners - a racist or non-racist? Wrong, this doesn't matter. Someone who is knowledgeable about foreigners.

And guess what, you saw the 1h video about how filthy and disgusting Indians are? Congratulations, you are the recipient of that knowledge and you qualify as knowledgeable, even if you don't know every detail.

You have personal encounters with niggers, shitskins and gypsies? Congratulations, your personal experience is a valuable source of information.

You merely read some books from jewish Marxists with nigger-fetish who wish they were niggers themselves? And perhaps your environment is in academia surrounded by somewhat literate niggers who represent a minority of their race? That's just the regurgitation of propaganda. It has no value. It is not experience. It is idiotic nonsense. At best you can say "according to what I read, niggers are just like us" and put your thesis into practice by visiting Detroit or Africa. A true scientist would try to provide a negative proof of that thesis, meaning he'd look for niggers doing nigger things as a proof that his thesis is wrong. That is an advancement of science, even if it is proving a negative (the thesis wrong).