1 year ago19 points(+0/-0/+19Score on mirror)3 children
This piece of history right here is very important. Germany played by the rules of war. Even back then there was clear definitions for war crimes and things to avoid. Every war after that has involved countries that doesn't give a fuck about war crimes, and sadly often gets away with it too because there's nobody to enforce those laws.
In any future war you can bet there will a ton of dirty war crimes, attacks on civilians, prisoners of war starved to death and tortured, herds of savages released into civilian society to rape the women, all sorts of demoralization campaigns.
1 year ago12 points(+0/-0/+12Score on mirror)1 child
The greatest historical damage was done by the barbarism of the Nuremberg "trials". Up until that time it was established practice that the leaders of a country defeated in war would not be held personally responsible; for example, Napoleon had to be neutralized but he still wasn't personally punished. Even the Kaiser wasn't personally punished for WWI (and he had a much bigger responsibility for it than Hitler did for WWII).
If the leaders of a country know that when they lose they'll be hanged, they'll get their nation to fight to the bitter end instead of surrendering when the war is strategically lost, costing many more lives on both sides.
1 year ago9 points(+0/-0/+9Score on mirror)2 children
The rules of war are jewish inventions meant to handicap White people. No one else gives a shit about them. There's 0 reason for White people to give a shit about them either.
1 year ago11 points(+0/-0/+11Score on mirror)2 children
If we go to war against israel right now I don't wanna hear about our soldiers raping schlominas, I don't wanna hear about kids being tortured, or prisoners starving, or gas that takes hours to kill civilians through suffocation.
We have the technology to drop big bombs and simply level the whole place, killing every kike instantly. And by doing so the only war crime we'd commit is killing anyone who identifies as civilian, which in case of the jews will be absolutely necessary.
No need to commit any other war crime. The rules of war shall not be infringed.
For Israel being destroyed a few temples would be a fine sacrifice, Not Christian but if hypothetically it was Castle Wwelesburg for example I’d also bite the bullet
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Children are not innocent, they carry the genetics of the jews that conceived them which have the genetic programming of parasites. Jewish women are literally bred to be fucked, that's why they're whores. Rape all the jewish women you want and kill all the kids. Why does anyone even need to question this?
Let the men decide what they want to do with them. You can kill them. I can kill them. If Billy wants to fuck one then whatever, I don't care care what Billy puts his dick into. Any White guy who simps for a jewish woman can get executed though.
The rules of war were a long standing established practice in Europe, which everyone followed because everyone knew that one time you win, one time you lose. Before WWI mainland European countries had always fought according to the rules, such as not bombing civilians, or not persecuting the losers, knowing that the next time the situation could be reversed.
America never knew about the rules of war because it was formed by fighting indian savages, and Britain because it felt safe from invasion.
The rules of war were only meant to apply in conflicts between White people.
I've never heard of this before. 3 really powerful red pills in 1 minute, that Hitler refused to use chemical weapons on the Allied forces, that he would've won if he did, and connecting it to the false Holocaust narrative.
I started reading Hitler's War but I stopped when I realized that he was intentionally misleading and trying to make Hitler look bad.
Does Hitler's War talk about the issue in this video?
It would be a redpill the size of the Gustav cannon if a British historian wrote in book that Hitler would have won the war if he only used nerve gas.
The claim of the video that he would have defeated the Red Army in 1944 if the Western front ended is difficult to believe... Germany had already been losing against the USSR long before Normandy, however I guess that they could have tried to stop the Red Army's advance if they had more resources.
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
Nobody said anything about being weak. You do not defeat niggers by becoming niggers. Furthermore, you do not defeat jews by becoming jews. If we forego our Whiteness under any auspices, we lose what makes the White race what it is, and then it will cease to exist. Exceedingly few people in our movement can understand this concept; those that can't are the real NPCs.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Victory is what matters at the days end, I don’t think this makes him a looser at all, But ultimately speaking I’d rather have some ZOGbot choking on gas then today’s hellworld though obviously that wasn't his expectation so don't blame him.
lofty ideas are only noble when both parties are espousing the same nobility, not when your enemies are *vile snakes* who bomb civilians
he should've gassed the british, executed every fucking kike in the Reich and nuked America & Russia
his victory would be bloody and be riddled with blood, but better that, than a bloody defeat where your enemies rape your women, feminize your children and starve your men to death
FYI the weird text on the top about 'cherry red' only applies to carbon monoxide poisoning, because the carbon monoxide loves to bind to your hemoglobin, becoming bright-red like it's super-oxygenated, but is almost impossible to peel off once its bound to it, which is how it kills you. Just pointing this out because the video is talking about nerve agents.
I will point out that nerve agents would be very poor choices for a 'gas chamber' though. Nerve agents are actually aerosolized oils, not quite 'airborne', so they precipitate and soak into porous surfaces and since they absorb through skin contact it would make removing and handling dead bodies extremely dangerous and risky for all involved. Concrete is highly porous so nobody would be able to even touch the surfaces inside without protection.
That isn't to say there aren't other options but nerve agents wouldn't be the ideal choice to deliver that way anyway. Really though carbon monoxide would be the easiest and safest since it can be safely vented for personnel access later. It's also the easiest to synthesize on-site.
In any future war you can bet there will a ton of dirty war crimes, attacks on civilians, prisoners of war starved to death and tortured, herds of savages released into civilian society to rape the women, all sorts of demoralization campaigns.
If the leaders of a country know that when they lose they'll be hanged, they'll get their nation to fight to the bitter end instead of surrendering when the war is strategically lost, costing many more lives on both sides.
We have the technology to drop big bombs and simply level the whole place, killing every kike instantly. And by doing so the only war crime we'd commit is killing anyone who identifies as civilian, which in case of the jews will be absolutely necessary.
No need to commit any other war crime. The rules of war shall not be infringed.
Eww.
No just kill them all and be done with it
America never knew about the rules of war because it was formed by fighting indian savages, and Britain because it felt safe from invasion.
The rules of war were only meant to apply in conflicts between White people.
WAR IS THE CRIME.