1 year ago17 points(+0/-0/+17Score on mirror)1 child
These surveys are useless because they're based on how people feel. Notice how "safe" is defined as dystopian mass surveillance hellscapes were everyone lives in fear at all time, i.e typical for a low trust society were everyone tries to jew everyone all the time, hoping to get away with it.
Do people really think that's safe? Do people really wanna live like that? In high trust societies there is no surveillance, there is no safety because everyone trust everyone and nobody tries to jew their neighbor.
Now obviously in a low trust society, you can have a mass shooting, 100 dead, then the terrorist is publicly executed and everyone will applaud and feel safe. While in a high trust society a gypsy can steal a bicycle and suddenly everyone fear more crime will happen, and people get frustrated because nobody saw who stole the bicycle. Isn't it obvious what's actually safe and what's unsafe or am I missing something?
Or does people value safety over the freedom of a high trust society? Because I can guarantee that you're many times more likely to get jewed i Abu Dhabi than you are in Trondheim.
Yep, in the end it's all about calculated risk. A 100% White society can still have traitors, shabbos goys, (((shape shifters))) and so on. Always notice, always look out for your neighbors.
> In Albania, we still have organized Mob who will scam and kill people for their own benefit, but to each his own.
Yea, we have them here in Norway too, not very nice people, but you're right, don't bother the gangs and they generally won't bother you. The media goes hysterical over every single incident, then the truth comes up were an old man practically walks right up to an armed gang of a dozen mobsters and tells them to fuck off. And people act all surprised why they shot him.
Gypsies will always be moving around, like the circus, staying a few days in each place then steal everything that isn't locked down. Always important to watch your stuff during gypsy season.
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
A commentary on the Canadian cities:
Coquitlam BC is majority whites and chinks, a river seperates it from Surrey (aka land of the pajeets) and it's just rural enough to dissuade niggers and brokies, so there are demographic and geographic barriers.
Quebec City is majority white because in order to live there you MUST be able to speak French, so there is a language barrier.
Oakville is likely the most expensive suburb in Ontario by far and it's almost all high income white people. So there is an income and class barrier.
Coquitlam goes from high density urban, with 40+ story high rises and dense traffic, to suburban. It's full of Asians, more than Whites. It's relatively safe, but I wouldn't live there.
Do people really think that's safe? Do people really wanna live like that? In high trust societies there is no surveillance, there is no safety because everyone trust everyone and nobody tries to jew their neighbor.
Now obviously in a low trust society, you can have a mass shooting, 100 dead, then the terrorist is publicly executed and everyone will applaud and feel safe. While in a high trust society a gypsy can steal a bicycle and suddenly everyone fear more crime will happen, and people get frustrated because nobody saw who stole the bicycle. Isn't it obvious what's actually safe and what's unsafe or am I missing something?
Or does people value safety over the freedom of a high trust society? Because I can guarantee that you're many times more likely to get jewed i Abu Dhabi than you are in Trondheim.