A good start
(media.scored.co)
Attack on Kikel.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
14 comments:
13
1 year ago
13 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+13Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
You still have American & UK kikes to contend with
but overall the shilling acitivity would drop significantly if Tel-aviv would be nuked tomorrow morning
but overall the shilling acitivity would drop significantly if Tel-aviv would be nuked tomorrow morning
Probably not, I think all the kikes who actually rule the world are in America and Europe.
Don't forget France, they have a ton of kikes.
Don't forget France, they have a ton of kikes.
Those 2 thinking drinking their own poison is a competitive team sport, I'm assuming the ones calling the shots are probably on private islands somewhere in the Caribbean. However, if isntrael were non-existed, it would destroy the pre-millennial dispensationalist cult that the jews have replaced western Christianity with. (((Their))) control would be utterly broken and real Christianity would rise again.
Did you know Consume Product originated from Reddit?
Go read a book? Okay, let me go pick up a copy of 50 Shades of Gray.
Idiots like you fail to understand that *any* creative medium can have degenerate subversive things in it. And *any* creative medium can have moral wholesome things in it.
Creative mediums are tools. Tools can never be moral or immoral. What makes them moral or immoral is how the author chooses to *use* the tool. Different authors will use the tool in different ways.
Your argument is exactly the same as the idiots who claim that guns are bad and we need to ban all guns. It's not the gun that's the problem, it's the person who uses the gun.
Idiots like you fail to understand that *any* creative medium can have degenerate subversive things in it. And *any* creative medium can have moral wholesome things in it.
Creative mediums are tools. Tools can never be moral or immoral. What makes them moral or immoral is how the author chooses to *use* the tool. Different authors will use the tool in different ways.
Your argument is exactly the same as the idiots who claim that guns are bad and we need to ban all guns. It's not the gun that's the problem, it's the person who uses the gun.
Toast message