Only way to win is to not play (((their))) game.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
13 comments:
8
1 year ago
8 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+8Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
To be fair, you don't have to be a NatSoc in order to notice the jew, oppose niggers and shitskins, oppose faggotry. NatSoc is rather a dedication to one's own nation, race, folk, which doesn't *have* to be there.
There are quite some cases where even White people do bad things, thus a mentality emerges of general hatred of humans. Just think of Christians cucking for niggers, kikes and faggots, "humanitarian" idiots feeding niggers in Africa, shabbos politicians, ZOG pigs "just following orders (with a grin)", useless incompetent bureaucrats, cowards, mindless consumers, egoistic pensioners who vote to let the niggers flow in because they are also idiots.
It's hard to have faith in humanity given that. And what we believe in is the good of our people, which we assume to be repressed.
Now imagine you don't have that faith, but you also notice the jew, hate the nigger and faggot. That's how you are not a NatSoc but still on their side.
There are quite some cases where even White people do bad things, thus a mentality emerges of general hatred of humans. Just think of Christians cucking for niggers, kikes and faggots, "humanitarian" idiots feeding niggers in Africa, shabbos politicians, ZOG pigs "just following orders (with a grin)", useless incompetent bureaucrats, cowards, mindless consumers, egoistic pensioners who vote to let the niggers flow in because they are also idiots.
It's hard to have faith in humanity given that. And what we believe in is the good of our people, which we assume to be repressed.
Now imagine you don't have that faith, but you also notice the jew, hate the nigger and faggot. That's how you are not a NatSoc but still on their side.
That is unfortunately not true.
Ayh have recently been re-watching old 90's shows WITH the commercials, flashing back to my teen years, and the commercials have reminded me that we had these "problems" vocalized of being concerned about racism and gays and trans and fetishes and etc etc. In fact watch cunt Bill Mahr Political Incorrect from the early 90's and you will see the same dialog favoring tolerance. It began before then too in the 80's and from speaking with others, it was tickled in in the 70's too.
Fact is that our modern social media phone in hand environment has over-saturated what was already happening and likely radicalized more people than before --> which is why they need to throttle information very very quickly ie "AI" chatbots for searches instead of actual searches.
Ayh have recently been re-watching old 90's shows WITH the commercials, flashing back to my teen years, and the commercials have reminded me that we had these "problems" vocalized of being concerned about racism and gays and trans and fetishes and etc etc. In fact watch cunt Bill Mahr Political Incorrect from the early 90's and you will see the same dialog favoring tolerance. It began before then too in the 80's and from speaking with others, it was tickled in in the 70's too.
Fact is that our modern social media phone in hand environment has over-saturated what was already happening and likely radicalized more people than before --> which is why they need to throttle information very very quickly ie "AI" chatbots for searches instead of actual searches.
It's really good redpill material, though. When attempting to redpill someone on propaganda they believe, but acknowledge the insanity of any other aspect of clown world, highlight the similarity between the two, and how quickly people can be fooled into believing obvious lies.
> *8 Terms* ***We*** *Avoid, and What* ***We*** *use Instead*
I'm sick of this emotionally-manipulative "collective pronoun" bullshit that tries to force a consensus. Every time someone does it, I want to punch them in the mouth.
> *Language matters.*
Yes, it fucking does. So stop trying to re-define it to suit delusional freaks.
I'm sick of this emotionally-manipulative "collective pronoun" bullshit that tries to force a consensus. Every time someone does it, I want to punch them in the mouth.
> *Language matters.*
Yes, it fucking does. So stop trying to re-define it to suit delusional freaks.
>Because many people are transgender, non-binary, or another gender...
Literally, *no one* are those.
Literally, *no one* are those.
(((Social Media))) allowed them to accelerate rapidly. It isolates people while bot farms can manufacture consensus in real time while censors shut down the actual majority opinion. But it, and AI, are a double edged sword in the propaganda war, because they also give complete nobodies like us the ability to fight back in the 5th generation info-war. Theres a reason theyre freaking out over AI so hard, and its not because theyre actually worried about a machine uprising, but because it puts the ability to manufacture false reality in the hands of the masses, which in return will allow the masses to end up questioning if what theyve been fed their entire life is true.
> there are plenty of men with vaginas, women with penises, and people who don’t identify with being either a man or a woman. Saying, “women need to get a Pap smear every 3 years once they turn 21” ignores and erases the many men who have vaginas and need Pap smears too. It’s also just incorrect, since women who have penises certainly don’t need Pap smears.
u/#Lcoomer
u/#Lcoomer
Toast message