Hello everyone!
I figured this would be a good place to start this petition.
First, I know this site has anonymous users.
That being said, there are users who are known, notorious jews, like u/SwampRangers u/CuomoisaMassMurderer u/TrancePhreak and others.
I would like for us to try to gather as many allies on Communities.Win and Scored.co to come together with us, and sign (i.e. comment on) this petition (i.e. post) / upvote it and get it in front of the Admins.
I think it will be helpful for newcomers to know who is a notorious jew by seeing a yellow star next to their username (it should be a pretty easy element to add for a front end developer, and could be toggled on, once admins and/or moderators decide someone is indeed, a jew).
That way, just like Europe in the Middle Ages and in Nazi Germany, the newcomers can know who to stay away from and ignore based on the yellow star.
So please help me in getting people from all different communities to upvote this post and comment on this petition to encourage the site admins to get the ball rolling on this initiative!
Thanks! And God bless!
But if you want me to give you an example, Swamp Jew argued with me on his board that the Old Covenant is still ongoing because even though Christ says He came to "fulfill" the Law and the definition of "fulfill" means to bring to completion, and St. Paul wrote several passages in the New Testament implicitly affirming the New Covenant replaces the Old Covenant, Swamp Jew says because that the word "supersession" isn't explicitly used and that neither Christ nor St. Paul explicitly says the Old Covenant is gone, then it follows the the Old Covenant still continues for the Jews, for some reason that is entirely unclear. And then he gets upvoted a LOT and I get downvoted a LOT, and other commenters, like CuomsoIsAJew come in and say things like "yeah, don't you understand what he is saying? Can't you read?" which causes one to feel gaslit. This is what I mean by Swamp Jew redefining, reframing, being intentionally obtuse, and gaslighting to argue his point in favor of Judaizing/Jews.
This is where it would be useful for you to defend your definition. You define fulfill as "to bring to completion". How do you arrive at that position? How does completion equal end? How does One doing their duty translate into the negation of the same duty of others? (I'm not making a position statement, just pointing out how your definitions need clarification for your audience)
>St. Paul wrote several passages in the New Testament implicitly affirming the New Covenant replaces the Old Covenant,
You need to cite your references, and then explain your logic - implicit means you derive a conclusion different than what is explicitly stated, and you have some unseen logic that helps you to that conclusion. The unseen is what your readers need to see to connect the same dots you have.
>Swamp Jew says because that the word "supersession" isn't explicitly used
The set of theological ideas summed up in "supersession" may or may not be explicitly stated, just like the set of theological ideas summed up by "trinity" may or may not be. Both words are not used, yes, but it took hundreds of years to derive these positions from sets of premises investigated by various writers. You collect a set of premises from scripture, then conclude yes or no on supersessionism, or trinity (both of which must also be explicitly defined, as they are not in scripture). Your set of premises need to be outlined and defined to test whether it is logical to make the conclusions that you make.
>neither Christ nor St. Paul explicitly says the Old Covenant is gone, then it follows the the Old Covenant still continues for the Jews
They don't explicitly state that "the OC is gone". So your choices are 1) to collect a set of premises and make a logical decision whether those premises sufficiently support your preferred conclusion that the Old Covenant is gone, or 2) it's not gone.
>for some reason that is entirely unclear
This is a good thing to discuss with SR. Why should the OC not be obeyed? Why should the Old Covenant be obeyed by Jews but not all other ethne? Seems like you're working backward from the conclusion that the Old Covenant should not be obeyed Jews bc it's not applicable for other ethne. Why is (or was) it applicable to one group but not the other? What justfies changes of the application to anyone? Do you really want anyone unbound by the commandments to not murder or steal? Is it okay for Jews to do that now, since you suggest they aren't obligated to those commands? Seems like everyone afraid of the Jews ought to be pushing them to perfectly obey Moses if they aren't going to obey Jesus, just out of self preservation. Isn't lawlessness antichrist?
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/fulfill
See this is why Jews like you are UNBEARABLE. Words have meanings. Dictionaries exist for a reason. You are asking MY definition. There is no MY definition or YOUR definition or Swamp Jew's definition. No! There is just THE OBJECTIVE DEFINITION OF THE WORD.
And if Jesus Christ FULFILLED or COMPLETED the Old Covenant upon His Death, which Christians for 2000 years have believed before weirdo Judaizers came along and said otherwise, how in the heck can one call themselves "Christian" but still maintain the Old Covenant is STILL IN FORCE, when Christ Himself said He came to fulfill it?
And I created a whole article with numerous Biblical passages and logical statements to support my position:
https://christtheking.info/dual-covenant-theology-is-just-plain-wrong/
But Swamp Jew just dismissed everything, reframed, redefined, and gaslit me. And I am getting the feeling you are about to do the same.
Are you are "Jewish Christian" by the way?
As for dual covenant, completion, or fulfillment, SR has been pretty consistent on his definitions, and his rejection of dual covenant theology. He defined what he thinks dual covenant theology entails, why he thinks it's wrong, and why the old covenant is not ended or binding (which he also defined).
I understand him to mean that dual covenant theology entails more than one salvific mechanism, whereas the old covenant was never a mechanism for salvation (he can correct my errors elsewhere). Whereas you have defined the Old Covenant as some sort of salvific mechanism which has been ended, which would mean you espouse one kind of disrupted dual covenant theology. You're basically a dispensationalist, for different reasons. The OC was either salvific, or it's not. If it's not, for what purpose has it ended? If it is, then you're dual covenant.
God saved the jews from Egypt before he gave them rules to live by to stay in their land in peace and differentiate themselves from the godless. It's a living metaphor that points to Christ and His work in all nations. Just like he saved Jews and Gentiles through Christ before we were taught to love your neighbor and all that entails. You should not look like the rest of the world by how you live your life. Doesn't mean that's how you were saved, but a consequence of it. God told the jews how they ought to live, and we would be better off if they would all abide by those rules. He gave Christians fewer specific rules, along with the power of his spirit to obey them, and we would all be better off if we would abide by those. I tend toward the catholic thought on this one - you may be baptized, but you're not going to make it into the promised land if you persist in rebellion.
I'm not a Jew in any sense of the word, but if Jew is the inverse of the cowardice and lies you clearly espouse, you alone would be a very good reason to convert to Judaism to get as far away from emulating your actions as possible. You may be preaching to the choir in this forum, but everywhere else, you're pushing normies into the arms of the Jews. Keep it up. Spin those wheels.
Do you people even read the bible? If you do, do you understand it? Paul covers this multiple times. Galatians 3.
https://www.wrmea.org/2015-october/the-scofield-bible-the-book-that-made-zionists-of-americas-evangelical-christians.html
Along with Freemasonry, which paved the way for the egalitarianism and liberalism that infected Christendom.
Jews and Freemasons are Satan's children.