New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I think it is important to call out what "white nationalism" really is. Too many people are scared of this term because they are worried that implies more than it implies.

At the extreme end are people who think that only whites should live in America. I would prefer if we called this idea as something else to distinguish between the idea I am about to propose. We don't need to exclude everyone else to have a white nation or in other words create a nation where white people are welcome and comfortable raising their families. In fact, historically, white people got along just fine with members of the other races -- provided they behaved according to our rules.

And then at the other end are people who say "It's OK to be white" but don't understand why that positive statement is too weak and doesn't actually help anyone, least of all white people.

White Nationalism is the idea simply that whites deserve to have at least ONE nation where they can call home and be comfortable being white. They need at least ONE nation where they can live without fear of constantly being assaulted, especially by members of other races.

I think it is extremely important to note that white people were willing to compromise with the world and embrace a global human rights, but we were rebuffed. NONE of the other races reciprocated on that, and they never will. As long as other races see us as "other", we MUST accept the reality that we are, in fact "other" and will always be "other". Not because we WANT to be other, but because THEY want us to be other.

If at some future day another race of men will embrace the concept of an international brotherhood, and I mean truly embrace it in such a way that they do not see themselves as different than whites or whatnot, and if whites are willing to accept them into their brotherhood, then PERHAPS at that future day we could unite and become one people. UNTIL THEN, however, AND THIS IS THE KEY, we MUST defend our own selves, our own families, our ethnicities, our culture, our religion and our society.

AND MOST IMPORTANTLY -- OUR LAND!

Again, I CANNOT emphasize this point to my white brethren enough: If you see yourself as part of an international brotherhood, you are deluding yourself, because THEY do not see you that way, and THEY will never accept you as one of them. YOU ARE WHITE BECAUSE THEY SAY YOU ARE WHITE, and for NO other reason.

Because they see you as, at best, competition, and at worst, mortal enemies, you MUST decide right now to secure for yourself your rights and liberties, as well as those of your posterity.

THIS IS THE ESSENCE OF WHITE NATIONALISM.

It is the ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of the fact that you are, indeed, white.

It is the recognition of the fact that you MUST unite together for your own mutual protection and security.

WE DO NOT NEED TO BE ANTAGONISTIC TOWARDS "THEM". They are already antagonistic towards us. White people know this. We know we are rejected, cancelled, hated, punished for the "crime" of existing. Our primary motivation is SELF-DEFENSE. That's it. We just want to live our lives!

WE DO NOT NEED TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT WE ARE SUPERIOR. It is irrelevant. Suppose we were inferior to all the other races. It would be ALL THE MORE reason to unite as nationalists. It doesn't matter what dimension of superiority that matters -- moral, intelligence, efficiency, whatever.

I propose that we either adopt this definition of white nationalism and reach out to our white brethren in explaining what it is and what it means, and getting them to call themselves this, or we find another term we can all unite behind.

I propose that we keep out the "bad" bits of white nationalism as ancillary or secondary. The PRIMARY goal is to allow ourselves to be defined as white, and then to unite together for our own protection. THAT'S what we need to focus on.
You must log in or sign up to comment
26 comments:
AmericanWASP on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 3 children
In my opinion, America doesn’t have to be 100% White, but Whites should be the supermajority. America should be easily identified as a White nation with American synonymous with White American. We’re obviously not gonna remove Indians from the US as they have an equal right to the land as Whites and I’d honestly be fine with a small black population, say ≈ 5%, concentrated primarily in the South. The real problem is those who have immigrated to the US since the 60s who have no connection to this land or our customs.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 2 children
Honestly, Canada, Australia, and the US are always going to be "melting pot" countries. Even when they were founded, it tended to be small enclaves of various European ethnicities (but also First Nations and Chinese) which gradually merged into a new culture. They're White cultures, but it's not the same as Europe being White. IMO, Europe is where the White countries should be, while non-European countries should be proving grounds for White culture to show it's superiority over it's neighbours.
AmericanWASP on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
In the US, until the 60s, there were almost no Asian immigrants with the exception of a small amount of Chinese and Japanese farmers in China and Hawaii.

While it’s true that all White people come from Europe, I don’t think White Americans should move back or anything but rather we should work to maintain and build on what we have here. A lot of White Americans, myself included, have ancestral ties to this nation some 400 years old and have little attachment to the Old World. America was a White country in the past, a country not only made up of nearly only Whites, but also one that viewed Whites as the only true Americans while natives lived on the frontiers and in reservations and blacks were relegated to plantations where they had no civil rights and were the property of Whites. I wish Europe good luck in their defense of their homeland, but America, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand were all once 90-99% White at one point, so it can happen again
deleted 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
yudsfpbc on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
The problem with this is the US economy dwarfs the European economy. Europe is a suburb to the city of the US.

I also happen to believe that the Americas are our promised land. God set it aside for our people, and if we will accept him as our God, he will let us keep it forever.
deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
yudsfpbc on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
> The Americans have never experienced a war like the First or Second World War in their own soil.

I disagree.

My ancestors had to fight indians, and they were much more ruthless and unpredictable than the Germans or Japanese.

In fact, we kind of felt sorry for the Germans and Japanese, because they were so ill-prepared to face the Anglo-Saxons who had conquered a continent.
yudsfpbc on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Amen.

We NEED a state that is a supermajority white, or we have nowhere to go to find protection and defense. It's not a matter about "WHITES ARE BETTER", it's about "WHITES DESERVE TO LIVE ALSO". The logical conclusion of "it's ok to be white" is that white people SHOULD have their own state.

And I'm 100% fine with blacks, hispanics, whatever, having their OWN state too, where they can protect themselves from "evil" whites or whatever. Give them their own government and army and weapons industry while we're at it.
Fabius on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Mexicans have a claim too. Sorry.

Spain owned half the country and their people here along with the indians (mestizos) owned the southwest and west.

This is why I don't give half a shit about America. It's Europe I want to remain a white ethnostate, which is also why their pushing the genocide in Europe so hard. They know that is the bedrock of the West.
MoonManMythos on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 2 children
Non-whites shouldn't be eligible for full citizenship, but a few, and I mean a minute few, could potentially inhabit the nation and not cause issue. Miscegenate unions shouldn't be tolerated or recognized. A model similar to the Nuremberg laws would be useful
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>and I mean a minute few

I'm talking about people who have skills that we don't, at all. Like cutting edge research scientists, world class musicians/artists, singularly successful entrepreneurs, etc.

We don't need Uber drivers.
MoonManMythos on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Even with this scant group of individuals, citizenship is not an option nor is it for their children.
yudsfpbc on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
I agree.

At the very least, no new non-white citizens, period.

Then we can talk about what to do with the non-whites who are already citizens.

if they can live in peace with us, I'm fine with that, honestly. Just leave us alone, we'll leave you alone.

If they can't live in peace with us, then we have to part ways, one way or the other.
MoonManMythos on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
You're understating the problem, a very harsh and strict vetting will take place with the worst of them having their prison sentence upgraded to execution, following that, those with no European genetics will be repatriated. Only those with a minimum of 50% euro genes and who meet certain meritocratic accomplishments may possibly be considered for non-citizen residency.
yudsfpbc on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
At the rate Europe is going, I am not convinced that I would allow random Europeans into our country!
MoonManMythos on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
The US is much worse off than Europe is
yudsfpbc on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
At least we have guns.

A LOT of guns.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
>WE DO NOT NEED TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT WE ARE SUPERIOR. It is irrelevant

I don't call myself a "White supremecist" because I consider the term to be redundant.
yudsfpbc on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Whether we are superior or not, we need to fight for our own survival.

That's the key to arguing here. Remember, the argument isn't "We are so awesome we deserve our own ethnostate", it is "Our very SURVIVAL depends on having an ethnostate that will protect us!"
Fabius on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
White supremacist refers to society. Should white rule? If yes, you're a white supremacist. If no: you're a liberal retard.
yudsfpbc on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Honestly, it doesn't matter whether whites "should" be superior. We ARE superior, so there's no hypothetical to consider.

Should we rule? I believe everyone should govern themselves, and by extension, whites should govern whites, blacks blacks, etc...

There's nothing to discuss on the supremacy front. It's a self-evident fact and to consider any alternative is mere fantasy.
Fabius on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
It implies 1488.
Toast message