New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
35
posted 1 year ago by AmericanInterests on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +35Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Um. Use your brain bro. If it's not real it makes 100% sense it would be "disturbingly accurate", because it's literally written like some shit **we** would write about the jews if we were intending to fake it.

If it wasn't real... what, you expected it to be inaccurate?

I don't think they're real at all. jews are all about ancient occult bullshit which is why their religion is so fucking gay and nonsense. Then this magical document appears out of thin fucking air, shit's not even written in goddamn kikespeak, and every single page tells you exactly what you want to hear?

I don't buy it for a second.

They appeared out of nowhere and the case for the weird plagurization taken from other people/books/speeches is too strong.

Also, there's no *point* to pretending they're real. Literally absolutely fucking nobody is going to read it who isn't already j-pilled. And if your arguments are using something in dispute like that as their bedrock you don't have fuck-all for arguments. In fact all you do is weaken your position because all anyone will do is say "oh they're fake" and disregard everything you say.

If the Protocols are accurate then you can literally just reform all your arguments around the accuracies without bringing up the book at all.
MrBaptist on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Yes, that's kind of what I meant... it seems accurate, so we *want* it to be real, but it doesn't really matter.

I wouldn't quote a deboonked source when a quick Jewgle search will find a 100% real source straight from the rodent's snout.
Toast message