New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
47
posted 1 year ago by Jarilo on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +47Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
whatlike_withacloth on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 2 children
Well it's the framing of the question. "Refugees" from what? 99% of the shitskins are simply seeking 1st world gibs, and if the gibs aren't there (e.g. unmitigated sex) then they bring the takes. But the word "refugee" is loaded - it sounds like a beaten woman seeking refuge at a woman's shelter or something. Of course you wouldn't refuse someone seeking asylum from abuses.

But that's not what the "refugees" are. They're government-sanctioned shitskin invaders. If the question were framed accurately, a lot more people would be open to resistance. Language and verbiage matter.
Jarilo on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror )
You are missing the point. Even with the way the questions are framed, more than a third of the population is comfortable with using violence against them. That is more than one third of the whole population, but you can be sure it's overwhelmingly White men. So, a majority of White men would be comfortable using violence against invaders, even if those invaders are portrayed as poor refugees.
These numbers should result in a bloody revolution, but there are no leaders, no guidance, no vision and very little if any organization. All this energy is wasted on complaining and riots.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 2 children
Yeah,I dont think a single white has an issue with actual peaceful refugees fleeing violence who *want to go back* when their country is safe enough for them. The issue is that the "refugees" and "immigrants" currently flooding white nations are mostly military age men with no intent of leaving or attempting to respect the native culture, and most of them arent from countries currently at war. They are *invaders*, plain and simple and should always be referred to as such. Taking control of language is important, whites will not do anything until they realize they are being invaded and their jew run governments are complicit.
Jarilo on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
This is not what these questions are about. Read them again, carefully.
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I do for the same reasons I do all of the other sorts, White or GTFO
Toast message