You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
9
LGBTQIAIDS on scored.co
1 year ago9 points(+0/-0/+9Score on mirror)
> the way we treated the blacks was deeply unfair and wrong.
The groids outnumbered Whites something like 90-1. The White population was never higher than 300,000 at absolute maximum. Thankfully, enough Whites did not have their minds rotted by the degenerative belief systems that now abound to entertain the idea that handing power to groids would be anything other than collective suicide and could quite possibly lead to White genocide in the most literal, non-metaphorical sense of the term.
Furthermore, enough of these Whites controlled the Rhodesian State. These Whites made all this clear to the British government, but the British could afford to entertain the idea of 'one man, one vote' in Rhodesia, since their minds were already rotted by these beliefs, and, besides, they did not have to endure its consequences. Thus the British entertained the idea even of attacking Rhodesia from Botswana and/or Zambia so as to bring about 'majority rule' forcefully.
> Rhodesia is gone now.
Yes, because you weren't Right-Wing enough. Ian Smith either had the idea that 'majority rule' was desirable and that he was presiding over a transition that needed to be gradual and carefully managed rather than instant as the British wanted, or he initially did not but was convinced of it by Kissinger, who was a committed enemy of White rule. Either way, the Rhodesians already had their minds rotted enough to make it clear that any 'racialist' who arrived in Rhodesia would be deported: a classic example of pointlessly punching Rightwards. You punch the 'racialists' only for the enemy to punch you as a 'racialist'. Indeed, Smith would not have disbenefited in any significant way if he became a race warrior, since there was no difference between a race war and his anti-Marxist crusade in the eyes of his enemies, who wrongly saw him as a Hitlerian racialist all the same. Only an outright American, British, or Soviet intervention would have saved the Botswanans and Zambians if the Whites had launched a racial total war against them. But, instead, the Whites only attacked the anti-Rhodesian insurgents that these countries hosted rather than the Botswanans and Zambians themselves. In fact, the Soviets still intervened in Zambia despite the Rhodesians never going after Kaunda's government: they tried to build up a force there with which they would then invade Rhodesia, only for the Rhodesians to strike first and destroy enough of it to convince them to back down.
The type of foreign fighter that Rhodesians most desired was an anti-Marxist crusader, not a racialist one. Amusingly, one such anti-Marxist crusader may have realized around 1975 that the Rhodesians had established some sort of semi-secret leadership training camp at which they were trying to convert captured groids, possibly including Nkomo himself, from Marxism. Realizing that the Smith government must be trying to reeducate these Marxist groids for the purpose of later empowering them, he then fled Rhodesia.
> integrated
Though the idea of power sharing in this context is especially ridiculous as those with whom you are sharing power will quite naturally reel all power back in on their end from you, even if unintentionally and by sheer force of numbers alone, Smith essentially agreed or came to agree. But he needed much more time, whereas you wanted the change to happen as close to 1963 or so as possible.
If the aforementioned anecdotal story of the re-education camp is true, then it is abundantly clear that the Smith government was committed to majority rule, but its plans were ruined by its enemies who, in their impatience, ensured that no hypothetical 'good' liberal groid would come to power and that only 'bad' Marxist groids like Canaan Banana (yes, an actual name) and Mugabe would come to power. The few years that Smith had were clearly not enough to raise enough 'good' groids who sung the praises of liberal individualism rather than the Marxism of those groids who were closest to power, such as Mugabe, Nkomo, and Tongogara. Smith eventually ran out of time and handed over power to a groid that was suspected to have been one of the 'good' ones, a Christian leader, Bishop Muzorewa. However, Muzorewa turned out—quite predictably, from the racialist's point of view—to be a total buffoon: he did little other than reverse the UDI, which turned all of the Rhodesian State back into the hands of its *enemy*, Britain. Britain, now in control of Rhodesia again, then oversaw the election which saw the empowerment of ZANU and the beginning of the nation's decline. Thus, all that the Whites achieved, in practice, was to delay something that would have happened around 1963-65 for fifteen or so more years, for it to thus happen in 1979-1980. Instead of coming to power consequent of 'one man, one vote' in the 1960s, ZANU simply had to wait to come to power consequent of 'one man, one vote' in 1980. That is all the difference that the Whites really made.
One is reminded of the Spanish Civil War, which the Republicans essentially won: they only had to wait four decades to realize it.
Seeing that the writing was on the wall, many Whites left Rhodesia around the late 1970s to early 1980s. Most found their way back to Britain, where they were met with discrimination, and a smaller number went elsewhere. Some remained until the late 1990s to early 2000s, and most of this number left when Mugabe started a new wave of attacks on the Whites at that time. Only a small number remain there today.
The number of White war deaths may have been as low as 2,500. Around 2,500 'good' groids also died. Total Rhodesian losses were thus around 5,000. As for the other side, around 50,000 'bad' Marxist groids died.
A bunch of White idiots in the military, like Wells, entertained the idea of launching a coup if Mugabe won, only to 'cuck', back down, and accept the results. Idiots among the South African Whites, like Viljoen, would later entertain the same idea, only to 'cuck' and back down as well, some fourteen years later. Whites are really their own worst enemy: they should have went down fighting as a matter of principle. It does not matter whether you lose and/or die; it is about dying for this most moral of all causes, which can only be, for the individual, a victory. Instead, they have lost the respectable place that they would have rightfully earned in the history books were they to fight to the death. The Spartans live on in the public imagination—they have achieved immortality in a sense, and thus are true victors—whereas the Rhodesians have already been forgotten.
> Zimbabwe will rise again ... Breadbasket ... richest in Africa
This nonsense is too pathological and remote from reality to even be worth addressing. It's almost like a horseshoe theory: a White Leftist 'anti-racist' starts spewing kneegrow supremacist bilge. The universe will sooner be destroyed than will any of this nonsense happen.
> ZANU-PF will fall
ZANU-PF, the ANC, &c. aren't the problem in this part of the world. Nor are individual groids, such as Mugabe and Zuma. Idiots such as this guy are always blaming one or the other: some groid president or some groid ruling party. Actually, this idiot isn't even the most delusional of Whites. Enter Timothy Stamps. Stamps didn't even think that the problem was Mugabe or ZANU-PF—he *joined* them—he thought that it was the Whites who were the problem. Stamps was the only White who rose to a high rank in ZANU-PF, a sort of token White that one could point to if someone said that groids were anti-White.
These presidents and ruling parties are all symptomatic of *groid rule*, and that will not be over any time soon. Just as Mugabe's replacement by 'crocodile' Mnangagwa changed nothing for the better, and just as the demise of Mugabe's G-40 faction at the hands of Mnangagwa's Lacoste faction changed nothing for the better, Mnangagwa losing power to Chiwenga and the 'COSLEG' or 'military' faction will not change anything for the better, nor will ZANU-PF losing power to the CCC change anything for the better.
It is also worth reminding people that *none* of these post-Marxist ruling parties in southern Africa have ever left power: the MPLA and FRELIMO have been ruling for about 50 years, ZANU-PF for almost 45, SWAPO for about 35, and the ANC for 30. The ANC is the most likely of them to be defeated, but even they are managing to retain power through building coalitions with parties that all of a sudden have given up any pretense of being their enemies. ZANU-PF will rule for a long time to come. It is possible that these groups will sooner resort to greater use of force or fraud than vacate power.
My last point: why did Mugabe go after the remaining Whites in the late 1990s to early 2000s? The Whites were disproportionately financially supporting the groid opposition party, today's CCC, then known as the MDC, based on this silly idea in the OP's image, that ZANU-PF was the problem and that the MDC would be the solution. White money was wasted supporting groid politics because of this idiotic reasoning. Mugabe wanted to intimidate them enough to stop, so he had his loyalists disguise themselves as bandits so that he could deny involvement when they attacked Whites and their farms. He also had bulldozed many groid homes and induced artificial famine in areas in which the opposition was popular, killing hundreds of thousands if not over a million of his fellow groids. One is reminded of the fact that the deaths of groids do not matter much to White Leftists *per se*: for them, what matters most is that Whites are not the ones causing them. This fact remains true today: they'll go on and on about the dozens that died at Sharpeville whilst being largely unaware of mass groid deaths such as this.
In that sense, Mugabe inadvertently did more to improve the former Rhodesia than any White ever did. Mugabe was well on the road to achieving 'TND': possibly well over a million died under his almost 40 year rule, whereas only tens of thousands died under the Rhodesians. May Mnangagwa and future Zimbaboonwean leaders achieve yet greater numbers.
The groids outnumbered Whites something like 90-1. The White population was never higher than 300,000 at absolute maximum. Thankfully, enough Whites did not have their minds rotted by the degenerative belief systems that now abound to entertain the idea that handing power to groids would be anything other than collective suicide and could quite possibly lead to White genocide in the most literal, non-metaphorical sense of the term.
Furthermore, enough of these Whites controlled the Rhodesian State. These Whites made all this clear to the British government, but the British could afford to entertain the idea of 'one man, one vote' in Rhodesia, since their minds were already rotted by these beliefs, and, besides, they did not have to endure its consequences. Thus the British entertained the idea even of attacking Rhodesia from Botswana and/or Zambia so as to bring about 'majority rule' forcefully.
> Rhodesia is gone now.
Yes, because you weren't Right-Wing enough. Ian Smith either had the idea that 'majority rule' was desirable and that he was presiding over a transition that needed to be gradual and carefully managed rather than instant as the British wanted, or he initially did not but was convinced of it by Kissinger, who was a committed enemy of White rule. Either way, the Rhodesians already had their minds rotted enough to make it clear that any 'racialist' who arrived in Rhodesia would be deported: a classic example of pointlessly punching Rightwards. You punch the 'racialists' only for the enemy to punch you as a 'racialist'. Indeed, Smith would not have disbenefited in any significant way if he became a race warrior, since there was no difference between a race war and his anti-Marxist crusade in the eyes of his enemies, who wrongly saw him as a Hitlerian racialist all the same. Only an outright American, British, or Soviet intervention would have saved the Botswanans and Zambians if the Whites had launched a racial total war against them. But, instead, the Whites only attacked the anti-Rhodesian insurgents that these countries hosted rather than the Botswanans and Zambians themselves. In fact, the Soviets still intervened in Zambia despite the Rhodesians never going after Kaunda's government: they tried to build up a force there with which they would then invade Rhodesia, only for the Rhodesians to strike first and destroy enough of it to convince them to back down.
The type of foreign fighter that Rhodesians most desired was an anti-Marxist crusader, not a racialist one. Amusingly, one such anti-Marxist crusader may have realized around 1975 that the Rhodesians had established some sort of semi-secret leadership training camp at which they were trying to convert captured groids, possibly including Nkomo himself, from Marxism. Realizing that the Smith government must be trying to reeducate these Marxist groids for the purpose of later empowering them, he then fled Rhodesia.
> integrated
Though the idea of power sharing in this context is especially ridiculous as those with whom you are sharing power will quite naturally reel all power back in on their end from you, even if unintentionally and by sheer force of numbers alone, Smith essentially agreed or came to agree. But he needed much more time, whereas you wanted the change to happen as close to 1963 or so as possible.
If the aforementioned anecdotal story of the re-education camp is true, then it is abundantly clear that the Smith government was committed to majority rule, but its plans were ruined by its enemies who, in their impatience, ensured that no hypothetical 'good' liberal groid would come to power and that only 'bad' Marxist groids like Canaan Banana (yes, an actual name) and Mugabe would come to power. The few years that Smith had were clearly not enough to raise enough 'good' groids who sung the praises of liberal individualism rather than the Marxism of those groids who were closest to power, such as Mugabe, Nkomo, and Tongogara. Smith eventually ran out of time and handed over power to a groid that was suspected to have been one of the 'good' ones, a Christian leader, Bishop Muzorewa. However, Muzorewa turned out—quite predictably, from the racialist's point of view—to be a total buffoon: he did little other than reverse the UDI, which turned all of the Rhodesian State back into the hands of its *enemy*, Britain. Britain, now in control of Rhodesia again, then oversaw the election which saw the empowerment of ZANU and the beginning of the nation's decline. Thus, all that the Whites achieved, in practice, was to delay something that would have happened around 1963-65 for fifteen or so more years, for it to thus happen in 1979-1980. Instead of coming to power consequent of 'one man, one vote' in the 1960s, ZANU simply had to wait to come to power consequent of 'one man, one vote' in 1980. That is all the difference that the Whites really made.
One is reminded of the Spanish Civil War, which the Republicans essentially won: they only had to wait four decades to realize it.
Seeing that the writing was on the wall, many Whites left Rhodesia around the late 1970s to early 1980s. Most found their way back to Britain, where they were met with discrimination, and a smaller number went elsewhere. Some remained until the late 1990s to early 2000s, and most of this number left when Mugabe started a new wave of attacks on the Whites at that time. Only a small number remain there today.
The number of White war deaths may have been as low as 2,500. Around 2,500 'good' groids also died. Total Rhodesian losses were thus around 5,000. As for the other side, around 50,000 'bad' Marxist groids died.
A bunch of White idiots in the military, like Wells, entertained the idea of launching a coup if Mugabe won, only to 'cuck', back down, and accept the results. Idiots among the South African Whites, like Viljoen, would later entertain the same idea, only to 'cuck' and back down as well, some fourteen years later. Whites are really their own worst enemy: they should have went down fighting as a matter of principle. It does not matter whether you lose and/or die; it is about dying for this most moral of all causes, which can only be, for the individual, a victory. Instead, they have lost the respectable place that they would have rightfully earned in the history books were they to fight to the death. The Spartans live on in the public imagination—they have achieved immortality in a sense, and thus are true victors—whereas the Rhodesians have already been forgotten.
> Zimbabwe will rise again ... Breadbasket ... richest in Africa
This nonsense is too pathological and remote from reality to even be worth addressing. It's almost like a horseshoe theory: a White Leftist 'anti-racist' starts spewing kneegrow supremacist bilge. The universe will sooner be destroyed than will any of this nonsense happen.
> ZANU-PF will fall
ZANU-PF, the ANC, &c. aren't the problem in this part of the world. Nor are individual groids, such as Mugabe and Zuma. Idiots such as this guy are always blaming one or the other: some groid president or some groid ruling party. Actually, this idiot isn't even the most delusional of Whites. Enter Timothy Stamps. Stamps didn't even think that the problem was Mugabe or ZANU-PF—he *joined* them—he thought that it was the Whites who were the problem. Stamps was the only White who rose to a high rank in ZANU-PF, a sort of token White that one could point to if someone said that groids were anti-White.
These presidents and ruling parties are all symptomatic of *groid rule*, and that will not be over any time soon. Just as Mugabe's replacement by 'crocodile' Mnangagwa changed nothing for the better, and just as the demise of Mugabe's G-40 faction at the hands of Mnangagwa's Lacoste faction changed nothing for the better, Mnangagwa losing power to Chiwenga and the 'COSLEG' or 'military' faction will not change anything for the better, nor will ZANU-PF losing power to the CCC change anything for the better.
It is also worth reminding people that *none* of these post-Marxist ruling parties in southern Africa have ever left power: the MPLA and FRELIMO have been ruling for about 50 years, ZANU-PF for almost 45, SWAPO for about 35, and the ANC for 30. The ANC is the most likely of them to be defeated, but even they are managing to retain power through building coalitions with parties that all of a sudden have given up any pretense of being their enemies. ZANU-PF will rule for a long time to come. It is possible that these groups will sooner resort to greater use of force or fraud than vacate power.
My last point: why did Mugabe go after the remaining Whites in the late 1990s to early 2000s? The Whites were disproportionately financially supporting the groid opposition party, today's CCC, then known as the MDC, based on this silly idea in the OP's image, that ZANU-PF was the problem and that the MDC would be the solution. White money was wasted supporting groid politics because of this idiotic reasoning. Mugabe wanted to intimidate them enough to stop, so he had his loyalists disguise themselves as bandits so that he could deny involvement when they attacked Whites and their farms. He also had bulldozed many groid homes and induced artificial famine in areas in which the opposition was popular, killing hundreds of thousands if not over a million of his fellow groids. One is reminded of the fact that the deaths of groids do not matter much to White Leftists *per se*: for them, what matters most is that Whites are not the ones causing them. This fact remains true today: they'll go on and on about the dozens that died at Sharpeville whilst being largely unaware of mass groid deaths such as this.
In that sense, Mugabe inadvertently did more to improve the former Rhodesia than any White ever did. Mugabe was well on the road to achieving 'TND': possibly well over a million died under his almost 40 year rule, whereas only tens of thousands died under the Rhodesians. May Mnangagwa and future Zimbaboonwean leaders achieve yet greater numbers.