New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
71
posted 1 year ago by Conspirologist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +71Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
MLJFireDragon747 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
It’s a desperate play but given how different those things are, that argument is gunna get tossed. Disney lacks a defense, this is gunna get settled. Had the issue arisen out of something to do with the Disney+ service the arbitration crap could work.
Lundynne on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
The thing is, Disney don't lack a defence. Disney didn't operate the restaurant, they leased it to another company. That they would make this arbitration argument even considering they have a robust argument is just stupid
Toast message