New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
92
(((Investors))) (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by Spoonks on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +92Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
MostlyPeacefulPoster on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 2 children
There's actually absolutely nothing wrong with buying and reselling something for more. If something is able to be bought and resold for more then the initial selling price was wrong and/or there's a cost of holding the asset which may or may not simply be tied to inflation of the currency.

The real issue one should be questioning is why buying a house and reselling it for more even works? It works because of the constant pressure of increasing demand given immigration and the long period of time to construct a house to increase supply. If we didn't import in tons of immigrants then flipping houses wouldn't work the same way it does today. The solution isn't to stop house flippers, it's to stop immigration.
Captain_Raamsley on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
The problem is basing your entire living on that. It is parasitic and unproductive.
MostlyPeacefulPoster on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
It's actually not unproductive. People who buy and sell add liquidity to the market and they are taking on a risk because they could be left holding the bag of an asset that actually depreciated in that period of time rather than appreciated.

Imagine you are normal family man who got a promotion but in a different city. You need to sell your house to move your family. If "scalpers" don't exist then perhaps you're forced to keep your house on the market to sell for 6 months but because of the existence of scalpers you manage to sell in 1 month. The scalpers are in fact helping you in this case because now you get a faster sale and don't need to pay mortgage interest expenses and or lose the time-value of your money tied up in the equity of the house.

Nothing about scalping is parasitic. You can simply not buy what they're selling if it isn't worth the price they're selling it for.
Captain_Raamsley on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
it is parasitic when it is the very means of living that they are scalping and then monopolize.
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Depends what it is, rare items nobody really needs, sure go ahead and try your luck. Essentials like a house, fuck no. Everyone needs a place to live and houses should not be seen as investments which put people into lifelong debt. Build more houses, and build houses of all types in all price classes, not just crappy drywall McMansions.

This artificially created (((housing crisis))) have made a lot of people homeless and put even more into (((debt))). All while kikes are getting richer from (((interest))), (((inflation))) and (((rent))).
MostlyPeacefulPoster on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Anyone who can't afford a house doesn't need a place to live. You think I care about some White bastard child from some whore who fucked Chad criminal who can't find a home? You think I care about the niggers? You think I care about the children of greedy boomers who kicked the kids out at 18? Or the kids who left willingly at 18yo because they wanted to sleep around and living at home was a burden for that?

If you cannot afford a house, it's because you don't deserve one. This is of course assuming we aren't letting in immigrants and/or subsidizing affordable housing for niggers while taxing good White men for it, etc... Get the government out of housing entirely and then there's 0 issue whatsoever. Sorry but no not everyone needs a house to live some people shouldn't even be living and should just die.
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
> This is of course assuming we aren't letting in immigrants and/or subsidizing affordable housing for niggers whole taxing good White men for it, etc...

Don't forget (((weird zoning laws))), (((investment))) properties such as houses being purchased only to be rented out at usury rates and (((Blackrock))) hoarding houses just to artificially inflate prices.

All of this is happening in today's America, all by design and it's getting worse every day. Most homeless people used to be middle class working families, that's how bad it's become. (((They))) have deceived you on this one. Not every homeless person deserves to be homeless, that's retarded.
MostlyPeacefulPoster on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
All problems tie back to eliminate the jew. Without kikes, I would stand by my words because I would never be priced out of a place to live. With kikes, things change but don't expect affordable housing laws to protect you with kikes still around. They'll change all laws to suit their ends.

Ironically, a lot of "weird zoning laws" are being done by liberal Whites to keep non-Whites/poors out under the guise of stupid liberalism.

There would be nothing wrong with "investment houses" if it were good White folk who owned them instead of foreigners. This is just another kike problem though. You can't solve the "housing problem" without solving the kike problem.
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
> All problems tie back to eliminate the jew. Without kikes, I would stand by my words because I would never be priced out of a place to live.

Correct, and this is exactly my point. Affordable housing, as in everyone being able to afford their own home through honest work. The Führer got unemployment down from insanely 50% to just 2% in a few years time. Simply by keeping the jew away from any position of authority.

> Ironically, a lot of "weird zoning laws" are being done by liberal Whites to keep non-Whites/poors out under the guise of stupid liberalism.

Yep, and as usual yet another jewish invention. This is nigger enabling infrastructure. By isolating yourself from niggers you allow niggers to live in your city, in their own neighborhood when the city should have remained fully connected, walkable and with nice stable curbs so that any nigger found can be dragged out and curb stomped.

> There would be nothing wrong with "investment houses" if it were good White folk who owned them instead of foreigners. This is just another kike problem though. You can't solve the "housing problem" without solving the kike problem.

More or less, if we only allow White people to own properties that would be a good start. And for another idea, skip property taxes on everyone's first house, only tax investment properties as those will generate money over time and to discourage hoarding for the sake of letting them sit and rot, which jews and pajeets typically do.
Toast message