There is nothing wrong with a social media site preferring paying customers to freeloaders. Nothing on a site is without cost. Everything requires some amount of cpu time and bandwidth, no matter how small, and every site requires some minimal amount of staff salaries as well. The "freedumb" era of the internet, where everything was subsidized to empower advertisers, who in turn enforce jewish censorship, was a fucking disaster. Advertiser subsidized platforms invariably ban naming the jew as soon as the jews think they are big enough to matter.
As for the bookmarks thing, could that functionality be extended to freeloaders? Sure, but why? It's better to make it clear the freeloaders are second class citizens, and that for full functionality one must contribute something material. People say they contribute content, but content is not material aid, it is completely worthless without an advertiser willing to count the eyeballs and subsidize it.
even the bookmark feature is now behind a paywall!
As for the bookmarks thing, could that functionality be extended to freeloaders? Sure, but why? It's better to make it clear the freeloaders are second class citizens, and that for full functionality one must contribute something material. People say they contribute content, but content is not material aid, it is completely worthless without an advertiser willing to count the eyeballs and subsidize it.