You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
15
IndomitiusOfCapua on scored.co
1 year ago15 points(+0/-0/+15Score on mirror)2 children
I always love hearing people's rationale for why he never spoke to it.
>The term holocaust was not coined until the 1960s so that's why he never spoke to it.
Okay, why didn't he mention the 6m jews who were killed without using the term "holocaust" then?
>Churchill struggled with mentioning the jews who were killed because he likely felt guilt in whether he could have done more to prevent it or not so it was a difficult subject to approach
Brah, if this was even halfway true and he felt guilt over it, the whole book would have been about easing his guilt. This is the worst cope ever.
>He does mention it. See, listen to this part of some letter he sent to someone: "There is no doubt in my mind that we are in the presence of one of the greatest and most horrible crimes ever committed." "It has been done by scientific machinery by nominally civilized men in the name of a great state and one of the leading races of Europe. I need not assure you that the situation has received and will receive the most earnest consideration from my colleagues and myself but, as the Foreign Secretary said, the principal hope of terminating it must remain the speedy victory of the Allied Nations."
That's the best you've got? He could be speaking of how the Germans were going to put lemon instead of milk in their morning tea.
1 year ago11 points(+0/-0/+11Score on mirror)1 child
Notable that the term "holocaust" was not 'invented' then. The term capital H, Holocaust, was [popularized in the 60's](https://files.catbox.moe/hxtd7i.png) when they started ramping up their propaganda machine.
Also that [the books by Eisenhower and De Gaulle](https://files.catbox.moe/olu48i.jpg) supposedly don't say anything about it either. I haven't actually read them, but I should ctrl F them at some point to check some terms.
1 year ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)1 child
Yeah, the term holocaust is ancient/greek hebrew, so its far older than the Holocaust narrative. Though the choice of that word to describe it is rather telling, since it refers to a sacrifice to God being completely consumed by fire.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Most notably sacrificing Christian children to Moloch and Baal by having them burned alive, often in bronze bulls. So if you search for these well documented historical holocaust sacrifices, you are drowned in the WW2 lies.
1 year ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)1 child
It’s funny to think that the Holocaust narrative basically unraveled over time because 4Chan style autists likely making edge lord humor eventually started doing some noticing in an attempt to be even edgier. Then there was no going back.
WW2 clearly happened, but for an event as big as the holocaust, you’d think there would be more evidence and almost any counter arguments to all the noticing. They got too greedy with the numbers and stories.
>The term holocaust was not coined until the 1960s so that's why he never spoke to it.
Okay, why didn't he mention the 6m jews who were killed without using the term "holocaust" then?
>Churchill struggled with mentioning the jews who were killed because he likely felt guilt in whether he could have done more to prevent it or not so it was a difficult subject to approach
Brah, if this was even halfway true and he felt guilt over it, the whole book would have been about easing his guilt. This is the worst cope ever.
>He does mention it. See, listen to this part of some letter he sent to someone: "There is no doubt in my mind that we are in the presence of one of the greatest and most horrible crimes ever committed." "It has been done by scientific machinery by nominally civilized men in the name of a great state and one of the leading races of Europe. I need not assure you that the situation has received and will receive the most earnest consideration from my colleagues and myself but, as the Foreign Secretary said, the principal hope of terminating it must remain the speedy victory of the Allied Nations."
That's the best you've got? He could be speaking of how the Germans were going to put lemon instead of milk in their morning tea.
Also that [the books by Eisenhower and De Gaulle](https://files.catbox.moe/olu48i.jpg) supposedly don't say anything about it either. I haven't actually read them, but I should ctrl F them at some point to check some terms.
WW2 clearly happened, but for an event as big as the holocaust, you’d think there would be more evidence and almost any counter arguments to all the noticing. They got too greedy with the numbers and stories.