New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
38
posted 1 year ago by Senketsu on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +38Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Thenoticingcontinues on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 3 children
So it is a man? I can't find anything conclusive enough.

Did he/she actually lose to other women before?
RoulerBleu on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
Khelif has XY chromosomes, he's a male, and was disqualified from another competition as such.

>On 24 March 2023, IBA disqualified athletes Lin Yu-ting and Imane Khelif from the IBA Women’s World Boxing Championships New Delhi 2023.

https://www.iba.sport/news/statement-made-by-the-international-boxing-association-regarding-athletes-disqualifications-in-world-boxing-championships-2023/

The rest of their public statement basically says : ''Why the fuck is the Olympics comitee letting males beat the shit out of female boxers who are at a biological disadvantage, defeating the point of having a female league? You're gonna get a lady crippled or killed.'' but with an overtly polite tone.
Thenoticingcontinues on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
I'm not disagreeing. Only thing sticking out is the losing to other women before. If that actually happened how were told.
YeIsRight on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
The dude jumped into high level female boxing competition, fighting women in the same weight class as him that dedicated their lives to the sport while he was brand new. Of course he lost some matches at the start, and that's not weird at all.

The proof that men should not be competing with women in combat sports is that within 3 years this guy became the best in the world in a field of women in his same weight class, in a sport he was relatively new to, while fighting women who spent their lives competing in the sport.
RoulerBleu on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Coach can say 'you have to lose some matches or you'll get kicked out of the league''.

That a troon can lose matches deliberately or not matters little in the end. Males have a biological advantage over women. That some men can lose to some women dosen't remove the competitive advantage. If it's allowed the podiums of women's events will eventually have 3 troons in all sports.

Males who identify as ''women'' can compete in the open league, with the other males.
Thenoticingcontinues on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I think you're missing what I'm saying.

I understand they can throw fights, but I'm using the fact they lost before to give credibility to he/she's rare disorder claim, if they actually lost fairly..

No real man at the same level of sport should lose to a woman unless it isn't fair match/some tomfoolery is about.

Hyperborean_ on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 3 children
Yea, if you have an XY chromosome you are genetically male. Apparently there are some weird anomalies where occasionally someone is born with an XY chromosome and there are mutations in their genes and it impacts their development/puberty, etc. I'm not sure if that's what is going on here or if this is a trannie. Either way, it shouldn't be fighting women in the Olympics.

And yea, I believe they had lost eight different times to a woman before these Olympics. I guess he finally got tired of losing and decided to hit the gym.
KingSweyn on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Settle the dispute with the strong, simple argument. Sweep up all the edge cases and put them in place.

Anything with a Y chromosome is male, period. IDGAF about genitals. Y = male. No Y = female.
Thenoticingcontinues on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
"Apparently there are some weird anomalies where occasionally someone is born with an XY chromosome and there are mutations in their genes and it impacts their development/puberty, etc"

Ya, that is what I was referring to. Either way, I'm in agreeance. The only thing that sticks out though is he/she lost to other women in the past, unless that was just part of the long con.

No actual male fighter should lose to a woman.
Hyperborean_ on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
*No actual male fighter should lose to a woman.*

Yea, I agree, but I could easily imagine a scenario where one of these men never trains and just uses their natural strength advantage to overpower 99% of the women they are fighting. As they move up the ladder, eventually they begin to fight women who have better technique and their strength advantage is somewhat negated. After a few years of getting embarrassed, they decide to finally commit to training, close the skill gap and their biological advantage tilts the scales back in their favor. Who knows if this is actually what happened, but I think it's at least plausible.
Thenoticingcontinues on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
I agree with you.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
The thing is, the exceptions to the rule are literally birth defects that often are fatal to the poor sod who ends up with them because they tend to be comorbid with other defects.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Just look at his fucking photo in the OP. Are you blind? Does that look like a woman to you?
Thenoticingcontinues on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I don't know, I've never seen one in RL.
Toast message