Consume Product

The point I'm making is that even things like art can be *objectively* judged. The judgment has to come from experts though, because the general population wouldn't be able to understand the difficulty of something. I wouldn't be able to distinguish Mozart from a random composer, for example, because I don't understand music.

The fact that a judge may be wrong does not invalidate this.

You're promoting the idea of the liberals, who claim that art cannot be objectively assessed and therefore the Sistine Chapel is the same as some feminist modern art bullshit.