For weeks people posted videos of bubbles in swamp water, mushroom clouds over the area, witness claims of toxic smelling fumes, with all kinds of false flag conspiracies and claims of cover-up.
The Hawaii thing was conspiracies about blue roof's blocking DEW waves, spotty destruction in neighborhoods, steel and engines melting at extremely hot temperatures not capable by wildfire, missing children that were supposedly kidnapped by pedophiles, claims that a billionaire razed the land and was going to force purchase it all now that it will be condemned, etc.
Sometimes conspiracy theorists go down wild long rabbit holes that just dead end.
If they are not dead ends, then follow up and complete the theory. I know the fake news media can't complete a story or follow up on a story and most of their bullshit turns out to be lies. But i expect better from the conspiracies community. We need to have details, sources, evidence, test and challenge our own claims, consider all other explanations, etc. Otherwise the Conspiracies forum reads like a tabloid for Consumption or just to rape people of their "loosh" lower their frequency steal their energy make them feel angry for pointless and destructive reasons.
So just to cover the bases, not saying you believe this, but:
>The Hawaii thing was conspiracies about blue roof's blocking DEW waves
All of this was a lie. They just edited out all the pictures that didn't show their narrative. Go through pictures of the fire, find something blue, crop out everything else, 'muh blue objects!'
>spotty destruction in neighborhoods
Largely because idiots don't know how wildfires work and that the fire spreads by blowing burning material. Sometimes you get lucky. House construction helps a lot too, a metal roof with no eaves and especially with shutters you can close (ie: hurricane shutters) greatly increases odds of house surviving.
>steel and engines melting at extremely hot temperatures not capable by wildfire
These were all bullshit. They were taking pictures of aluminum rims, which melt in even a freaking campfire, and claiming 'omg melted steel'. There were other cases where they were going on about 'melted glass', but that literally doesn't even make sense with their 'energy weapon' claims since normal automotive glass isn't opaque to infrared radiation. Also they didn't account (or they did but intentionally omit) that cars are full of a fluid that burns at higher temperatures than glass melts at.
>claims that a billionaire razed the land and was going to force purchase it all now that it will be condemned, etc.
You don't believe that Oprah ordered a trillion-dollar space weapon be used to improve her view of the beach?
Thank you for helping me make my point. It was conspiracy theorists going off the deep end, over analyzing stuff, refusing to consider the simplest most reasonable explanations, etc.
Stuff like this discredits real conspiracies. I think my fellow conspiracy theorists are familiar with this sort of well poisoning.
Some people just want content content more content. They consume conspiratorial nonsense like a drug.
The Hawaii thing was conspiracies about blue roof's blocking DEW waves, spotty destruction in neighborhoods, steel and engines melting at extremely hot temperatures not capable by wildfire, missing children that were supposedly kidnapped by pedophiles, claims that a billionaire razed the land and was going to force purchase it all now that it will be condemned, etc.
Sometimes conspiracy theorists go down wild long rabbit holes that just dead end.
If they are not dead ends, then follow up and complete the theory. I know the fake news media can't complete a story or follow up on a story and most of their bullshit turns out to be lies. But i expect better from the conspiracies community. We need to have details, sources, evidence, test and challenge our own claims, consider all other explanations, etc. Otherwise the Conspiracies forum reads like a tabloid for Consumption or just to rape people of their "loosh" lower their frequency steal their energy make them feel angry for pointless and destructive reasons.
>The Hawaii thing was conspiracies about blue roof's blocking DEW waves
All of this was a lie. They just edited out all the pictures that didn't show their narrative. Go through pictures of the fire, find something blue, crop out everything else, 'muh blue objects!'
>spotty destruction in neighborhoods
Largely because idiots don't know how wildfires work and that the fire spreads by blowing burning material. Sometimes you get lucky. House construction helps a lot too, a metal roof with no eaves and especially with shutters you can close (ie: hurricane shutters) greatly increases odds of house surviving.
>steel and engines melting at extremely hot temperatures not capable by wildfire
These were all bullshit. They were taking pictures of aluminum rims, which melt in even a freaking campfire, and claiming 'omg melted steel'. There were other cases where they were going on about 'melted glass', but that literally doesn't even make sense with their 'energy weapon' claims since normal automotive glass isn't opaque to infrared radiation. Also they didn't account (or they did but intentionally omit) that cars are full of a fluid that burns at higher temperatures than glass melts at.
>claims that a billionaire razed the land and was going to force purchase it all now that it will be condemned, etc.
You don't believe that Oprah ordered a trillion-dollar space weapon be used to improve her view of the beach?
Stuff like this discredits real conspiracies. I think my fellow conspiracy theorists are familiar with this sort of well poisoning.
Some people just want content content more content. They consume conspiratorial nonsense like a drug.