You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)
> Why do you think liberalism and communism are genuine movements? Why believe jews?
Maybe we have a different definition of the word "genuine".
When I say that they are genuine movements I mean that they have a philosophical and intellectual basis and they make sense of paper. I do not mean to say that they actually work or that they are good.
> They are about killing and enslaving goyim based on writings from the Talmud.
Liberalism, communism, and the Talmud do not talk about killing and enslaving the goyim. They absolutely do not.
The only text that explicitly tells the Jews to kill and enslave the goyim is the Bible.
> Your movement would fail shortly after because communism is not a viable economic system and the only long-lasting communist states were propped up by jewish power.
North Korea is not propped up by Jews. In fact, it's one of the few places on earth where Jews have no control.
> Again believing what jews say. Why?
I don't believe anyone. It's just a fact that Marx wrote one of the most antisemitic and jewpilling essay in the history of antisemitism.
> You don't think Lenin, Stalin or Pol Pot had houses or cars or excess food for themselves?
They didn't have any personal property. They had their necessities met of course, like any head of state, but it's not that they were swimming in luxury like any random Jewish banker in America at their time.
Lenin, Trotsky, etc. risked their lives for their ideas - you must give them credit. They didn't care about personal gains. That's also what made them dangerous. People who only care about making money are weak.
>They both exist under the bad philosophy of egalitarianism
No, communism is not egalitarian. Equality is neither their goal nor their justification for their acts. It's about removing economic exploitation.
> How would they move tens of millions of Africans to Europe in 1917?
By putting a sign that says "niggers welcome".
> Even today it's been a slow process.
Niggers enter Europe and America by the millions, and that's in spite of our ZOG trying to slow them down to not make the goyim wake up too soon.
If the borders were truly open, like the USSR could have done but didn't, then we'd have 100 millions niggers come to Europe and America in the next few months.
Niggers are desperate to live with us.
Maybe we have a different definition of the word "genuine".
When I say that they are genuine movements I mean that they have a philosophical and intellectual basis and they make sense of paper. I do not mean to say that they actually work or that they are good.
> They are about killing and enslaving goyim based on writings from the Talmud.
Liberalism, communism, and the Talmud do not talk about killing and enslaving the goyim. They absolutely do not.
The only text that explicitly tells the Jews to kill and enslave the goyim is the Bible.
> Your movement would fail shortly after because communism is not a viable economic system and the only long-lasting communist states were propped up by jewish power.
North Korea is not propped up by Jews. In fact, it's one of the few places on earth where Jews have no control.
> Again believing what jews say. Why?
I don't believe anyone. It's just a fact that Marx wrote one of the most antisemitic and jewpilling essay in the history of antisemitism.
> You don't think Lenin, Stalin or Pol Pot had houses or cars or excess food for themselves?
They didn't have any personal property. They had their necessities met of course, like any head of state, but it's not that they were swimming in luxury like any random Jewish banker in America at their time.
Lenin, Trotsky, etc. risked their lives for their ideas - you must give them credit. They didn't care about personal gains. That's also what made them dangerous. People who only care about making money are weak.
>They both exist under the bad philosophy of egalitarianism
No, communism is not egalitarian. Equality is neither their goal nor their justification for their acts. It's about removing economic exploitation.
> How would they move tens of millions of Africans to Europe in 1917?
By putting a sign that says "niggers welcome".
> Even today it's been a slow process.
Niggers enter Europe and America by the millions, and that's in spite of our ZOG trying to slow them down to not make the goyim wake up too soon.
If the borders were truly open, like the USSR could have done but didn't, then we'd have 100 millions niggers come to Europe and America in the next few months.
Niggers are desperate to live with us.