New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
64
posted 1 year ago by derjudenjager on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +64Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
The two ideologies are completely different even if the Jews have used both (at different points in time) against us.

systemthrowaway on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
>The two ideologies are completely different

In what way?
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Communism has nothing to do with equality. Communism is an ideology based on historical materialism which wrongly concludes that a capitalist system is intrinsically exploitative. It promotes class warfare and the establishment of a dictatorship of the proletariat, which in practice means that economic activities need to be planned by a central authority. It is a totalitarian and collectivist movement.
Marx or Lenin have never talked about "equality"; this is just some bullshit that boomer MAGAtards believe because they can't see the difference between Lenin and Bernie Sanders.

Modern liberalism is an ideology which puts the individual above society and promotes democracy and equality, equality meaning that every single aspect of an individual needs to be made equal - e.g. a homosexual needs to be *equal* to a heterosexual. But modern liberalism is happy with economic inequalities and it believes in a market economy, with some exceptions such as "diversity" and "sustainability".

I could write a whole fucking essay. They are so different that they have basically nothing in common.

In a nutshell communism is about a different economic system, modern liberalism is about equality in everything *except* the economy. In America today a CEO makes 200 times what the average worker of his company made. Does that look like communism to you?
systemthrowaway on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Sorry, I meant to reply a few days ago but forgot.

You're working under the assumption that communism was a legitimately attempted economic system and liberalism is a legitimately attempted moral system, which are both false. Liberalism and communism are talmudic ideologies entirely focused on knocking all goyim down to equal levels of poverty in order to enslave them.

>In America today a CEO makes 200 times what the average worker of his company made. Does that look like communism to you?

Yes? CEOs take all the shekels from a worker in the same way a communist takes all the crop from a farmer without paying for it.

Modern liberalism is just a continuation of communism. The only reason the USSR didn't import infinite retarded brown workers was because they weren't readily available at the time.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
> You're working under the assumption that communism was a legitimately attempted economic system

It is.

> and liberalism is a legitimately attempted moral system

It is.

> Liberalism and communism are talmudic ideologies

What's Talmudic about them?

> entirely focused on knocking all goyim down to equal levels of poverty in order to enslave them.

No. Only because Jews used them for this purpose doesn't mean that this is their intrinsic nature. I can be a communist and argue that Jews must be exterminated because they are not manual workers. In fact Marx was against Jews.

> Yes? CEOs take all the shekels from a worker in the same way a communist takes all the crop from a farmer without paying for it.

This doesn't make sense. A communist leader in the USSR didn't have personal property. I know it's hard to accept, but commies back then did what they did because they believed in an ideology and not for personal gains. They risked their own lives for the revolution.

> Modern liberalism is just a continuation of communism.

This makes no sense.

> The only reason the USSR didn't import infinite retarded brown workers was because they weren't readily available at the time.

LOL WUT?
You think there were no shitskins in 1917?
systemthrowaway on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Why do you think liberalism and communism are genuine movements? Why believe jews?

>What's Talmudic about them?

They are about killing and enslaving goyim based on writings from the Talmud.

>Only because Jews used them for this purpose doesn't mean that this is their intrinsic nature. I can be a communist and argue that Jews must be exterminated because they are not manual workers

Your movement would fail shortly after because communism is not a viable economic system and the only long-lasting communist states were propped up by international jewry.

>In fact Marx was against Jews.

Again believing what jews say. Why? Even if he did hate other jews he still hated Whites and Christians far more.

>A communist leader in the USSR didn't have personal property.

You don't think Lenin, Stalin or Pol Pot had houses or cars or excess food for themselves?

>Communism and liberalism aren't the same

They both exist under the bad philosophy of egalitarianism and have the same perpetrators with the same goals.

>You think there were no shitskins in 1917?

How would they move tens of millions of Africans to Europe in 1917? Even today it's been a slow process.
Toast message