1 year ago6 points(+0/-0/+6Score on mirror)6 children
this is why i hesitate to call myself a nationalist. First of all it implies that i support the kikes that rule pretty much every country. Second, it validates the historical conflicts between various european nations and doesn't let those conflicts die in the hope of european collaboration against the existential threat we currently face. Sure, for example norwegians and greeks may not have the same phenotype, with slightly different cultures, but we share a hell of a lot of customs and behaviours and can coexist. If you look towards the old pagan gods before christianity, they are very very similar in all of europe. This is the type of "multiculturalism" that is good, collaboration in different, although similar nations.
1 year ago14 points(+0/-0/+14Score on mirror)2 children
How does being a nationalist support the kikes? Please explain.
Your other points are valid, but the solution is to have a hierarchy of identity, applicable to different situations. You can proud Norwegian or Greek, but you are also European and White. We Europeans / Whites respect other White nationalities and have common interests worth fighting for.
It's just silly to be a proud Norwegian or Greek or German or Italian or French etc.
It is silly because White people's culture and inventions were developed *together*. If you look at the history of our civilization you'll see that it knows no borders between European nations, where ideas and technologies and sciences are born and then brought forward by different men in different European countries.
In fact the concept of "Western civilization" is universally recognized even by the mainstream media. They just say "Western" to not say "Aryan" or "White", but the concept is there.
Yes, but all nationalities also have their idiosyncracies and unique achievements. The key is to understand that we Whites are all brothers and should work together.
1 year ago9 points(+0/-0/+9Score on mirror)2 children
A nation is a group of people who are derived from a common ancestor and have a certain unique racial admixture. The French, for example, are largely Germanic, Celt, and Roman, each being certain percentage that is unique to the Frank. The Spanish are Iberian, Roman, Phoenician, Germanic, with a light percentage of Moor. Germans are Celt, Germanic, and Proto-Germanic (whoever inhabited the land before their arrival). Scandinavians are Germanic and Proto-Germanic.
This is what gives the European races distinct features and intellectual or artistic peculiarities. There is more than white skin and the character of every nation should be preserved.
Nationalism is not fidelity to land or government.
i agree, but we are similar enough to cooperate. I'm saying nationalism is associated with serving the government and the government, well we know all about that. I prefer to think of myself as an ethno-centrist
1 year ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)2 children
What a surprise the mutt is a European federalist. Just erase any hope of ethno-nationalism yeah, just blend into a white cultureless paste like 80s America or something. Non-Europeans need to stfu when discussing European matters.
American whites consist of many races of our own. Many here don't understand or see that.
In the North East coast we have people who are a high percentage of Dutch. The Southerners are almost identical to Anglo-Saxon, but have high Scottish percentage. The Midwest has a very high percentage of German and Irish blood. The Smokey Mountain people are largely Scottish. Then there are various French populations.
We took the established races of Western Europe and formed new races. The problem is that there has never been a distinct identity connected to them. When the Pennsylvanians invade a place like South Carolina, an established American race is being upset by foreign blood.
1 year ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)2 children
i remember in Leon Degrelle's book he remarked that "Nationalism" isn't actually optimal and he views himself as a Aryanist Internationalist
i.e Belgium and France are the same people, they are both aryans, both eligible for the Wisdom of National Socialism
similar to Germans and Austrians, Prussians too
in their view, it was [a united Struggle against Bolshevisim](https://pomf2.lain.la/f/rj43cml9.jpeg)
and i truly believe a [United White World](https://pomf2.lain.la/f/kehzgsts.jpeg) (South America should have a Catholic Monarchy instead of AnCap faggotry but i didn't make this map)
The British were race traitors.
Note that even if the French fought against Germany, they didn't start mass murdering German civilians with terror bombing like the British, and many French then fought in the SS.
> i remember in Leon Degrelle's book he remarked that "Nationalism" isn't actually optimal and he views himself as a Aryanist Internationalist
And yes, this is the optimal position.
In more recent times the idea of an Aryan block was promoted by Faye, except that he didn't include America because he wasn't openly talking about the kikes. The kikes in America need to be exterminated before America can be a White country again.
Modern nations have little to do with the various Aryan subraces, especially if you exclude Scandinavian countries.
You're talking like for example Norwegians and Greeks are two distinct groups, but that is only true at the civic nationalist MAGAtard level. The ancient Greek civilization was created by Aryans of Nordic blood. To this day there are Greeks who are blonde with blue eyes, and the same is true for all European nations.
A Greek with blue eyes has more in common with a Norwegian with blue eyes than with a Greek with brown eyes.