New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Good evening gentlemen, today I would like to share a bit of a reckoning that I have had, and this would be the realization that whites evolved as ambush predators in ice age Europe. Explaining higher pound for pound strength than pure blacks among the general white populace

Every one of the world's strongest men is a white man. Eddie Hall, Brian Shaw, Hafþor Bjornsson, Martins Licis, Bill Kazmeier, etc. This was also still the case before steroids. George Hackenschmidt, George Lurich, John Grimeck, Louis Cyr. Every one of these men is white. Nothing changed with the introduction of steroids into heavy weightlifting. It's one of the whitest sports at a high level that you could ever be in.

So, back to the point of ambush predators, what do you think of when you think of an ambush predator? Probably a cat, any kind of cat. A housecat to a tiger and everything in between. Certainly not the only ambush predators, but definitely the most successful and the best example that I could give. Whats peculiar about cats? Ridiculous pound for pound strength, an 8 lb cat is killing the fuck out of an 8 lb dog. A mountain lion is going to kill or at least severely maim a similar sized dog. Even dogs bred for strength are inferior to the cat in brute force.

Cats have shorter and more muscular limbs in comparison to their body size than dogs. Who else has shorter and more muscular limbs in comparison to their body size than another species? Whites vs negroes. Whites have on average shorter legs and arms and a longer torso, but the muscularity of our limbs is superior. This has been proven time and time again with any grip strength test that has ever been conducted. Any WSM meet that you will ever see is utterly dominated by whites. A 200 lb white that lifts regularly will (probably) be stronger than a 200 lb black African who lifts regularly. The point about cats being able to kill similar sized dogs I made above? Also applies. Any fight between a nigger and a white person, with them of similar size, usually ends with the former on the deck (unless they swarm)

Wait, why is this? You've been told your entire life that humans evolved as persistence hunters like dogs and not ambush predators like cats. "Were built for marathons", so you have been told repeatedly. "Look at the tribe of niggers in Africa that hunts antelope by chasing them!!! That's how we're supposed to be". If you're a nigger, yes, but not if you're white.

Here's the thing: imagine hunting an antelope vs hunting a mammoth. Or any of the absolutely massive and unwieldy mammals that inhabited the eurasian steppe. The antelope has very fast and sustained speed, necessitating that "marathon" build. Do you know what didn't? Mammoths. A modern elephant can only run a 50 meter dash before piddling out and getting tired, it was probably *less* for the mammoth. But what did the mammoth have in its favor? It was an absolutely fucking enormous creature that could kill you without a second thought. Even if it was tired, it can still easily murder you.

Do you know what else hunts big ass animals by bringing them down with an ambush and brute strength? Felines. What doesn't? Dogs.

For a group of ancient European humans to drive spears into a single mammoth and bring it down to eat, they would have had to have had superior strength to Africans. Strength isn't needed for a bushman to hunt an antelope, just endurance. Likewise, being able to run a marathon doesn't help with hunting a mammoth because you aren't going to affect it the same way. What does help? The strength to hit it harder. You can say "fire and gravity" but there aren't many cliffs on a fucking steppe so this idea is retarded. Fire helped, but killing the thing even if it's scared (perhaps even especially of its scared), even if it's almost dead, requires a very great deal of strength indeed.

This is not counting the other huge animals that Europeans had to square up against. Cave bears, dire wolves, Saber toothed cats, lions that make African lions look like house cats. All of these actively predated early Europeans. What did niggers have to deal with? The same shit they currently do, and almost all of the animals in Africa largely leave them alone (I wouldn't eat a nigger either)
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
PopularCancer on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
we also developed archery and then firearms, and over thousands of years adaptation/survival of the fittest ensured that genetically speaking, we are far better marksmen than any negro will ever be. Hunters who took down prey regularly because of strong visual acuity and the ability to do trigonometry in their head without even knowing what trig is, the ability to estimate distance, windage, elevation and drop. Those are all things that Europeans have been doing for thousands of years, while equatorial species ran marathons, and ate the never ending buffet of things that just keep on growing in their climate.

Living in northern latitudes also caused adaptation around the intellect
necessary to plan for starvation cycles/winter, food storage, short cycle agrarian processes that maximized yield and calories produced for the effort expended vs the growing season, teamwork around planting and harvest cycles, and many other things that were not required adaptations in the other species

They have literally "had it easy" since the dawn of time, and will continue to ride us like donkeys until we kill every last one of them
systemthrowaway on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Firearms have not been around long enough to have affected our evolution
Toast message