Ιt ịs fḁscỉnӑtịng hōw fạst ịt hɑppꬲnꬲd tọō. Ιt wɑs fɑst ēnōùgh thɑt ịt mǔst hạvḙ bꬲḙn ḁlgסrịthmıc ḁnd ӑblē tō ůndꬲrstɑnd cọntꬲxt. Ι trȳ tô ḁvọɨd bèỉng tōס dịrēct, ӑnd ōf cōůrsẹ Ι pḁỵ ɑttēntıōn tō dḁncꬲ thḙ lïnès.
Sọ ạnỷwạȳ, gɨvḙn thӑt ịt's prộbɑblỿ ạlgסrɨthmïc, Ι crẹątẹd ą lıttlē cộdē thɑt chӑngès tēxt ïn ą wạỵ tô ṳsẹ chӑrḁctèrs thɑt ḁrḙ nḙvèr ǔsēd ỉn thꬲ Εnglịsh ląngṳạgḙ. Thɨs tḙxt ɨs ąn ꬲxɑmplḙ ôf hסw ït lסōks lɨkꬲ.
Whḁt Ι dıd ïs Ι chӑngèd ӑll vסwḙls ḁnd "ȳ" tọ sịmılӑr lôōkịng chạrḁctḙrs. Whąt Ι ꬲxpḙct tọ hɑppèn ɨs thɑt thḙỉr ӑlgọrɨthms bḙcômẹ ṳnӑblꬲ tọ pąrsꬲ whąt Ι wrıtẹ, pộssïblỿ ēvḙn ůnḁblè tộ dḙcỉphẹr thè ląngůḁgè. Ι ąssůmè thḙỹ ạrꬲ ụttꬲrlȳ ïncộmpẹtènt, sס wē'll sḙꬲ hôw ɨt tṳrns ôụt.
Ι drḁftẹd ït ịn mḁȳbē ~15 mınǔtḙs, ɑnd mọst ọf thḙ wọrk wąs tô fịnd sùỉtạblē lḙttꬲrs. Sô ỉt cɑn bꬲ grèạtlȳ ỉmprộvèd, ạnd wỉth bēttèr sůïtïng lḙttẹrs bꬲcộmꬲ ẹvẹn môrē rèɑdąblē.
Fṳck JèwTụbē. Αnd fụck NΙGGΕRS.
I can do Ctrl+F in my browser and search for some of the substrings in your post and it will find them correctly despite the diacritics and mangling. In other words it's smart enough to generalize over similar codepoints and find the matches anyway. There's even a built-in option to ignore diacritics in fact the default is to ignore. I think we can assume YT's filters are at least that sophisticated.
For example I can search for strings like "got silenced" and "created a little code" and it will find them. It's enough info to piece together some of the meaning even only a small minority of substrings are getting matched this way. Most aren't. E.g. "most of the work was to find suitable" matches but "most of the work was to find suitable letters" fails. Although again I'm sure the JT goyblocker is way more sophisticated.
GL
I tried to find some words, but it failed for all of them. So you got me worried for a moment there. Good to know it's better to read, and also works better as well.
Nah I think the full character swapping is a good idea.
You should try out those Japanese Roman compatibility characters if you haven't already. They are U+FF21, U+FF22, U+FF23.
There's also the circled letters https://symbl.cc/en/unicode/blocks/enclosed-alphanumerics/#subblock-24B6
There's also a bunch of other candidates like subscripts (U2090) as well as a whole family of nonsense lookalikes that form an incomplete alphabet
https://symbl.cc/en/212B/
https://symbl.cc/en/212C/
https://symbl.cc/en/212D/
Anyway I hope any of this helps. New version looks good.