The British guide to riot response
(media.scored.co)
Every one of these accounts have addresses
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
7 comments:
14
1 year ago
14 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+14Score on mirror
)
1 child
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
8
1 year ago
8 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+8Score on mirror
)
This is the real problem, Whites may riot but we never go and simply kill our enemies.
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Blame Europe and the UK in particular, but the USA never had to do a fucking thing. The USA could have done absolutely nothing, it wouldn't have even hurt our alliances with these countries
We did it anyways because we are ran by jews. Not to protect the legacy of dying empires, not because of our alliances, not to get involved with european business, but because of jews. War is an infinite money pit to generate more debt and balloon the MIC. That's it. It was an opportunity. It's not the UK's fault, or France's fault, that we ever got involved, they started it but we never had to do anything about it. If they didn't start these problems, we would find a way to do it on our own. Because we are ran by jews.
None of these wars were even supposed to be won. Just sustained for as long as possible. To create more debt for the fed. Vietnam was winnable, with minimal casualties, strike the head of the snake, but this wasn't done, we just pissed off in the jungles of South Vietnam. And then allied with vietnam immediately afterwards, making the entire affair pointless. Gulf War was won, but we didn't have to get ourselves involved with an insurgency. Afghanistan was unwinnable, and they knew it, but kept the conflict sustained.
Actually, if getting involved with these things *were* to vanguard dying empires, I would find it much more honorable than what it was actually because of
We did it anyways because we are ran by jews. Not to protect the legacy of dying empires, not because of our alliances, not to get involved with european business, but because of jews. War is an infinite money pit to generate more debt and balloon the MIC. That's it. It was an opportunity. It's not the UK's fault, or France's fault, that we ever got involved, they started it but we never had to do anything about it. If they didn't start these problems, we would find a way to do it on our own. Because we are ran by jews.
None of these wars were even supposed to be won. Just sustained for as long as possible. To create more debt for the fed. Vietnam was winnable, with minimal casualties, strike the head of the snake, but this wasn't done, we just pissed off in the jungles of South Vietnam. And then allied with vietnam immediately afterwards, making the entire affair pointless. Gulf War was won, but we didn't have to get ourselves involved with an insurgency. Afghanistan was unwinnable, and they knew it, but kept the conflict sustained.
Actually, if getting involved with these things *were* to vanguard dying empires, I would find it much more honorable than what it was actually because of
>Not to protect the legacy of dying empires
When you realize the "British" Empire was actually the Jewish Empire, it all makes more sense. It was to keep that empire alive by transfering its center of power from decaying England (which was probably too close to Germany and Russia for (((their comfort)))) to easily defensible Washington D.C.
When you realize the "British" Empire was actually the Jewish Empire, it all makes more sense. It was to keep that empire alive by transfering its center of power from decaying England (which was probably too close to Germany and Russia for (((their comfort)))) to easily defensible Washington D.C.
Toast message