New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I used to see people elsewhere post a lot of (intentional?) wordsalad describing detailed complex "neoreactionary" views which they admitted was purposely verbose (using more words than necessary to filter out "pseuds" or dumber people).
 
This seems to have filtered out in favor of a general MAGA populism (?), maybe just because it's the biggest alternative movement that's closest nearby to those views (?).
 
Anyway is anyone in to NRx views or is it a stale or dead meme at this point or what should we think of it?
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
2 years ago 1 point (+1 / -0 ) 2 children
I'd like to probe the "why" of this. was it abandoned as a wrong view? was it a fad? to me it just felt like pragmatic MAGA populism won out. Like "it would be cool to have a monarch with an aristocracy but for now I'll settle for triggering the libs"
None
2 years ago 2 points (+2 / -0 )
The problem with a monarchy is always the monarch. For every good and just ruler, history has shown like fifty megalomaniacal and sociopathic tyrants.
None
2 years ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Our land and people are undeserving of a king of any value.
We do not have 1000 statesmen to take over even if there was a king.
The only monarch that is worthy is Jesus.
None
Toast message