There is a lot of PilPul surrounding discussions on Racial realism.. They are all about muh definitions, and categorizations, and what not.
It is evident to a rational person that Race is real, and major differences exist among the Races, but it is not easy to debate.
On the other hand, Skin Color is unmistakable, and it does not require any dialectical definitions, it can come down to a simple Hex, fitting into a color scale.
I'm looking at Skin Tone maps of the world, and the correlation is also undeniable.
The darkest people live in Africa, and the darkest States in Africa also have the lowest quality of life.. Haiti is also one of the darkest, and worst.
How might a Leftist debate against Skin Tone realism.. where ever there is light skin, there is prosperity, and where ever the dark skin exists there is poverty..
This holds true everywhere in the world... Even look at S America, and you see that Argentina, and Uruguay are the Lightest, and the most prosperous.. The N of Brasil is Dark, the S of Brasil is light, and prosperity follows.
In India the N is lighter, and better off..
How can they deny it consoomer bros?
Have you every watched a debate on Skin color only?
